Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  I v. SWEDEN

  Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Russia) (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  I v. SWEDEN - [Deutsche Übersetzung] by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Russia)

• milo.bamf.de
• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  I v. Sweden

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09
• EGMR, 12.11.2014 - 61204/09

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

• EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 54131/10

  Asyl, Widerruf, Achtung des Familienlebens, Refoulement, subsidiärer Schutz, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  Nevertheless, the Court considers that the unsafe general situation there is not sufficiently serious to conclude that the return of the applicants to Russia would amount to a violation of Article 3 of the Convention (see, for example Bajsultanov v. Austria, no. 54131/10, §§ 64-72, 12 June 2012 and Jeltsujeva v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 39858/04, 1 June 2006).

  Finally, the majority did not attach sufficient importance to the fact that the case concerns expulsion to a High Contracting Party to the Convention, which has undertaken to secure the fundamental rights guaranteed by it (see, as a recent authority with respect to Chechnya, Bajsultanov v. Austria, no. 54131/10, § 70, 12 June 2012).

• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  39221/98 and 41963/98, ECHR 2000-VIII (Belgium); and Demades v. Turkey, no. 16219/90, 31 July 2003 (Cyprus)).
• EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 69481/01

  BAZORKINA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  Having regard to its case-law concerning disappearances and ill-treatment in Chechnya (see, among many others, Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481/01, 27 July 2006; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, 5 April 2007; and Akhmadova v. Russia, no. 25548/07, 3 April 2012) and having regard to the recent information on the human rights and security situation in Chechnya, the Court is well aware of on-going disappearances, of arbitrary violence, of impunity and ill-treatment in detention facilities, notably with regard to certain categories of people, such as former rebels, their relatives, political adversaries of Ramsan Kadyrov, journalists, human rights activists and individuals who have lodged complaints with international organisations.

 
• EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 67972/01

  SOMOGYI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  Article 36 § 1 of the Convention, taken together with Rule 44 § 1 (a) and (b) of the Rules of Court, allows a Member State to intervene in a case lodged with the Court by one of its nationals against another Member State (see, for example, Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 60654/00, ECHR 2007-I (Russia); Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no. 48321/99, § 6, ECHR 2003-X (Russia); Somogyi v. Italy, no. 67972/01, ECHR 2004-IV (Hungary); Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 16219/90

  DEMADES v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  39221/98 and 41963/98, ECHR 2000-VIII (Belgium); and Demades v. Turkey, no. 16219/90, 31 July 2003 (Cyprus)).
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

  IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  Having regard to its case-law concerning disappearances and ill-treatment in Chechnya (see, among many others, Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481/01, 27 July 2006; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, 5 April 2007; and Akhmadova v. Russia, no. 25548/07, 3 April 2012) and having regard to the recent information on the human rights and security situation in Chechnya, the Court is well aware of on-going disappearances, of arbitrary violence, of impunity and ill-treatment in detention facilities, notably with regard to certain categories of people, such as former rebels, their relatives, political adversaries of Ramsan Kadyrov, journalists, human rights activists and individuals who have lodged complaints with international organisations.
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 69480/01

  LOULOUÏEV ET AUTRES c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  Having regard to its case-law concerning disappearances and ill-treatment in Chechnya (see, among many others, Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481/01, 27 July 2006; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, 5 April 2007; and Akhmadova v. Russia, no. 25548/07, 3 April 2012) and having regard to the recent information on the human rights and security situation in Chechnya, the Court is well aware of on-going disappearances, of arbitrary violence, of impunity and ill-treatment in detention facilities, notably with regard to certain categories of people, such as former rebels, their relatives, political adversaries of Ramsan Kadyrov, journalists, human rights activists and individuals who have lodged complaints with international organisations.
• EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 39858/04

  JELTSUJEVA v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  Nevertheless, the Court considers that the unsafe general situation there is not sufficiently serious to conclude that the return of the applicants to Russia would amount to a violation of Article 3 of the Convention (see, for example Bajsultanov v. Austria, no. 54131/10, §§ 64-72, 12 June 2012 and Jeltsujeva v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 39858/04, 1 June 2006).
• EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01

  BAYSAYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  Having regard to its case-law concerning disappearances and ill-treatment in Chechnya (see, among many others, Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481/01, 27 July 2006; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, 5 April 2007; and Akhmadova v. Russia, no. 25548/07, 3 April 2012) and having regard to the recent information on the human rights and security situation in Chechnya, the Court is well aware of on-going disappearances, of arbitrary violence, of impunity and ill-treatment in detention facilities, notably with regard to certain categories of people, such as former rebels, their relatives, political adversaries of Ramsan Kadyrov, journalists, human rights activists and individuals who have lodged complaints with international organisations.
• EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 25548/07

  AKHMADOVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  Having regard to its case-law concerning disappearances and ill-treatment in Chechnya (see, among many others, Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481/01, 27 July 2006; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, 5 April 2007; and Akhmadova v. Russia, no. 25548/07, 3 April 2012) and having regard to the recent information on the human rights and security situation in Chechnya, the Court is well aware of on-going disappearances, of arbitrary violence, of impunity and ill-treatment in detention facilities, notably with regard to certain categories of people, such as former rebels, their relatives, political adversaries of Ramsan Kadyrov, journalists, human rights activists and individuals who have lodged complaints with international organisations.
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring
• EGMR, 19.10.2012 - 43370/04

  Transnistrien

• OVG Niedersachsen, 25.05.2018 - 9 LA 64/18

  Nationales Abschiebungsverbot; Afghanistan; unmenschliche oder erniedrigende …

  Insoweit sind die vorhersehbaren Folgen einer Rückkehr unter Berücksichtigung sowohl der allgemeinen Lage im Zielstaat als auch der persönlichen Umstände des Ausländers zu prüfen (EGMR, Urteile vom 5.9.2013 - 61204/09 [I. ./. Sweden] - HUDOC Rn. 56;… vom 6.6.2013 - 2283/12 [Mohammed ./. Austria] - HUDOC Rn. 95;… vom 29.1.2013 - 60367/10 [S. H. K. ./. The United Kingdom] - HUDOC Rn. 72;… vom 28.6.2011 - 8319/07 und 11449/07 [Sufi and Elmi ./. Great Britain] - HUDOC Rn. 216).
• VG Oldenburg, 09.02.2021 - 5 A 6362/17

  Afghanistan: keine inländische Fluchtalternative für Familie mit minderjährigen …

  Insoweit sind die vorhersehbaren Folgen einer Rückkehr unter Berücksichtigung sowohl der allgemeinen Lage im Abschiebungs zielstaat als auch der persönlichen Umstände des Ausländers zu prüfen (EGMR, Urteile vom 23.8.2016 - 59166/12 [J. K. and others v. Sweden] - H U D O C Rn. 83; vom 5.9.2013 - 61204/09 [I. v. Sweden] - HUDOC Rn. 56; v o m 6.6.2013 - 2283/12 [ M o h a m m e d v. A u s t r i a ] - HUDOC Rn. 95; vom 2 9 .
• VG Halle, 12.07.2019 - 2 A 693/17
  Insoweit sind die vorhersehbaren Folgen einer Rückkehr unter Berücksichtigung so wohl der allgemeinen Lage im Zielstaat als auch der persönlichen Umstände des Aus länders zu prüfen (EGMR, Urteile vom 5. September 2013 - 61204/09 [I. ./. Sweden] - HUDOC Rn. 56;… vom 6. Juni 2013 - 2283/12 [Mohammed ./. Austria] - HUDOC Rn. 95;… vom 29. Januar 2013 - 60367/10 [S. H. K. ./. The United Kingdom] - HUDOC Rn. 72;… vom 28. Juni 2011 - 8319/07 und 11449/07 [Sufi and Elmi ./. Great Britain] - HUDOC Rn. 216).