Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 13196/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,32264) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
UNCUOGLU v. TURKEY
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[FRE]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 18030/11
MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTSÁG v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 13196/07
However it is in the interests of legal certainty, foreseeability and equality before the law that courts should not depart, without good reason, from precedents laid down in previous cases (see, mutatis mutandis, Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27238/95, § 70, ECHR 2001-I, and Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030/11, § 150, ECHR 2016). - EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 18064/91
HIRO BALANI v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 13196/07
The extent to which this duty to give reasons applies may vary according to the nature of the ruling and must be determined in the light of the specific circumstances of the case (Ruiz Torija v. Spain, 9 December 1994, § 29, Series A no. 303-A; Hiro Balani v. Spain, 9 December 1994, § 27, Series A no. 303-B; and García Ruiz, cited above, § 26). - EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 13196/07
Moreover, according to the Court's case-law reflecting a principle linked to the proper administration of justice, judgments of courts and tribunals should state the reasons on which they are based (García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 26, ECHR 1999-I, and the cases cited therein).