Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 25313/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,59782) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GALLO v. SLOVAKIA
Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 52690/99
MAJEWSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 25313/07
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Kuril v. Slovakia, no. 63959/00, §§ 35-43, 3 October 2006; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 27-34, 20 May 2008; or Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 33-41, 4 November 2008). - EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 63959/00
KURIL v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 25313/07
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Kuril v. Slovakia, no. 63959/00, §§ 35-43, 3 October 2006; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 27-34, 20 May 2008; or Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 33-41, 4 November 2008). - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 25313/07
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03).
- EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 25763/02
RAPOS v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 25313/07
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Kuril v. Slovakia, no. 63959/00, §§ 35-43, 3 October 2006; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 27-34, 20 May 2008; or Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 33-41, 4 November 2008). - EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 23865/03
BIC v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 25313/07
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Kuril v. Slovakia, no. 63959/00, §§ 35-43, 3 October 2006; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 27-34, 20 May 2008; or Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 33-41, 4 November 2008). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 25313/07
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Kuril v. Slovakia, no. 63959/00, §§ 35-43, 3 October 2006; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 27-34, 20 May 2008; or Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 33-41, 4 November 2008).