Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 47460/07, 49257/07, 49265/07, 1028/08, 11746/08, 14387/08, 15094/08, 16159/08, 18876/08, 18882/08, 18997/08, 22997/08, 23007/08, 23100/08, 23102/08, 26892/08, 26908/08, 29305/08, 29306/08, 29323/08, 29389/08, 30792/08, 30795/08, 31202/08, 31968/08, 32120/   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2010,65422
EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 47460/07, 49257/07, 49265/07, 1028/08, 11746/08, 14387/08, 15094/08, 16159/08, 18876/08, 18882/08, 18997/08, 22997/08, 23007/08, 23100/08, 23102/08, 26892/08, 26908/08, 29305/08, 29306/08, 29323/08, 29389/08, 30792/08, 30795/08, 31202/08, 31968/08, 32120/ (https://dejure.org/2010,65422)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05.10.2010 - 47460/07, 49257/07, 49265/07, 1028/08, 11746/08, 14387/08, 15094/08, 16159/08, 18876/08, 18882/08, 18997/08, 22997/08, 23007/08, 23100/08, 23102/08, 26892/08, 26908/08, 29305/08, 29306/08, 29323/08, 29389/08, 30792/08, 30795/08, 31202/08, 31968/08, 32120/ (https://dejure.org/2010,65422)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05. Januar 2010 - 47460/07, 49257/07, 49265/07, 1028/08, 11746/08, 14387/08, 15094/08, 16159/08, 18876/08, 18882/08, 18997/08, 22997/08, 23007/08, 23100/08, 23102/08, 26892/08, 26908/08, 29305/08, 29306/08, 29323/08, 29389/08, 30792/08, 30795/08, 31202/08, 31968/08, 32120/ (https://dejure.org/2010,65422)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,65422) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    RAKIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (12)

  • EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 4678/07

    TESIC v. SERBIA

    The Court recalls that it has consistently held that a constitutional appeal should, in principle, be deemed effective within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention in respect of applications introduced against Serbia as of 7 August 2008 (see Vincic and Others v. Serbia, no. 44698/06 and others, § 51, 1 December 2009; see also Rakic and Others v. Serbia, no. 47460/07 and others, § 39, 5 October 2010, and Hajnal v. Serbia, no. 36937/06, §§ 122 and 123, 19 June 2012).
  • EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 41694/07

    ISAKOVIC VIDOVIC v. SERBIA

    Finally, the Court has consistently held that a constitutional appeal should, in principle, be deemed effective within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention in respect of all applications introduced against Serbia as of 7 August 2008 (see Vincic and Others v. Serbia, no. 44698/06 and others, § 51, 1 December 2009; see also Rakic and Others v. Serbia, no. 47460/07 and others, § 39, 5 October 2010, and Hajnal v. Serbia, no. 36937/06, §§ 122 and 123, 19 June 2012).
  • EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 27471/15

    MIRKOVIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

    Consequently, the Government's objection concerning the applicants" failure to make use of an appeal on points of law, in the particular circumstances of the present case (compare and contrast Rakic and Others v. Serbia, nos. 47460/07 and 29 others, §§ 37-38, 5 October 2010), must be dismissed.
  • EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 23001/08

    MATIC AND POLONIA DOO v. SERBIA

    47460/07 and others, § 37, 5 October 2010).
  • EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 18650/09

    TOMIC AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO

    Consequently, the Court joins its examination of this question to its assessment of the merits of the applicants" complaints (see, mutatis mutandis, Rakic and Others v. Serbia, nos. 47460/07 et seq., § 38, 5 October 2010).
  • EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 42670/16

    ZIVKOVIC AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA

    However, the Court notes that it has already found that, given its nature, an appeal on points of law must in principle, and whenever available in accordance with the relevant procedural rules, be considered an effective domestic remedy within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Rakic and Others v. Serbia, nos. 47460/07 and 29 others, § 37, 5 October 2010, and Debelic v. Croatia, no. 2448/03, §§ 20 and 21, 26 May 2005).
  • EGMR, 05.04.2017 - 44698/06

    VINCIC AND OTHERS AND 2 OTHER CASES AGAINST SERBIA

    47460/07+.
  • EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 27458/06

    LAKICEVIC AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO AND SERBIA

    The Court recalls that it has already established that an appeal on points of law in civil proceedings (revizija) and an appeal on points of law in criminal proceedings (zahtjev za ispitivanje zakonitosti pravosnazne presude), are, in principle, effective domestic remedies within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Rakic and Others v. Serbia, nos. 47460/07 et seq., §§ 37 and 27, 5 October 2010, and the authorities cited therein; Debelic v. Croatia, no. 2448/03, §§ 20 and 21, 26 May 2005; and Mamudovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 49619/06, 10 March 2009).
  • EGMR, 13.09.2011 - 37204/08

    ZIVIC v. SERBIA

  • EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 14336/09

    KECOJEVIC v. MONTENEGRO

    The Court recalls in this regard that an appeal on points of law is, in principle, an effective domestic remedy within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Rakic and Others v. Serbia, nos. 47460/07 et seq., § 37, 5 October 2010, and the authorities cited therein; see also Debelic v. Croatia, no. 2448/03, §§ 20-21, 26 May 2005) and that thereby the Supreme Court could have put right the alleged violation before it was submitted to the Court (see paragraph 15 above).
  • EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 38713/04

    PIVDENBUDTRANS, PAT v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 31.01.2012 - 39992/08

    MILJKOVIC v. SERBIA AND OTHER APPLICATIONS

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht