Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 21272/12 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BECKER v. NORWAY
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression;Freedom to impart information);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BECKER v. NORWAY - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)
[DEU] Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression;Freedom to impart information);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
- juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BECKER v. NORWAY
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 21272/12
- EGMR, 03.10.2018 - 21272/12
Papierfundstellen
- afp 2018, 500
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 08.12.2005 - 40485/02
NORDISK FILM & TV A/S c. DANEMARK
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 21272/12
That being said, the Court has held that protection afforded to journalists when it comes to their right to keep their sources confidential is "two-fold, relating not only to the journalist, but also and in particular to the source who volunteers to assist the press in informing the public about matters of public interest" (see Nordisk Film & TV A/S v. Denmark (dec.), no. 40485/02, ECHR 2005-XIII and, for example, Stichting Osade Blade (dec.), no. 8406/06, § 64, 27 May 2014).The relevant case-law used to support the disputed statement in paragraph 76 is Nordisk Film & TV A/S v. Denmark (dec.), no. 40485/02, ECHR 2005-XIII, and Stichting Osade Blade (dec.), no. 8406/06, § 64, 27 May 2014.
- EGMR, 23.02.2017 - 43395/09
DE TOMMASO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 21272/12
Furthermore, the Court reiterates that it is primarily for the national authorities to interpret and apply domestic law (see, as a recent example, De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395/09, § 108, 23 February 2017). - EGMR, 22.10.2013 - 20577/05
SACE ELEKTRIK TICARET VE SANAYI A.S. v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 21272/12
Although the applicant did not appeal against the fine, the Court, having regard to the violation found above (see paragraphs 83 and 84 above) and the principle of restitutio in integrum, finds in the circumstances that neither considerations concerning the directness of the causal link or the applicant's possibilities to mitigate losses, nor her possibilities of further domestic remedies against the fine viewed in isolation, alter the consideration that the fine should not have to be paid, or if it has been paid, should be reimbursed by the respondent Government (see, in comparison, as regards Article 6 of the Convention, Sace Elektrik Ticaret ve Sanayi A.S. v. Turkey, no. 20577/05, § 39, 22 October 2013). - EGMR, 22.11.2012 - 39315/06
TELEGRAAF MEDIA NEDERLAND LANDELIJKE MEDIA B.V. AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 21272/12
At the same time the Court recalls that in cases where a source was clearly acting in bad faith with a harmful purpose, it held that the conduct of the source can never be decisive in determining whether a disclosure order ought to be made but will merely operate as one, albeit important, factor to be taken into account in the balancing exercise under Article 10 § 2 of the Convention (see, paragraphs 67-68 above quoting Financial Times Ltd and Others, cited above, §§ 63 and 66, and also Telegraaf Media Nederland Landelijke Media B.V. and Others v. The Netherlands, no. 39315/06, § 128, 22 November 2012). - EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 49085/07
GÖRMÜS ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 21272/12
Issues concerning source disclosure have not only arisen with respect to disclosure orders, but also in cases dealing with investigative searches, including Görmüs and Others v. Turkey, no. 49085/07, 19 January 2016 and Nagla v. Latvia, no. 73469/10, 16 July 2013.
- Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 16.09.2021 - C-302/20
Autorité des marchés financiers - Vorabentscheidungsverfahren - Binnenmarkt für …
43 Zum Quellenschutz vgl. nur Urteile vom 27. März 1996, Goodwin/Vereinigtes Königreich (CE:ECHR:1996:0327JUD00174889), und vom 5. Oktober 2017, Becker/Norwegen (CE:ECHR:2017:1005JUD002127212).