Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 34197/15   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2017,37472
EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 34197/15 (https://dejure.org/2017,37472)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05.10.2017 - 34197/15 (https://dejure.org/2017,37472)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05. Oktober 2017 - 34197/15 (https://dejure.org/2017,37472)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,37472) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MITEV v. BULGARIA

    Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 6058/10

    JÓZEF WOS v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 34197/15
    The fact that he was unsuccessful cannot be considered pertinent (see, similarly, Józef Wos v. Poland, no. 6058/10, § 54, 28 June 2016).
  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 32662/06

    BISER KOSTOV v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 34197/15
    It is noteworthy that no obvious omission to collect relevant evidence could be attributed to the authorities, in contrast with a number of cases where the Court found a violation of Article 3 on the grounds that the authorities had made a series of crucial omissions during investigations into applicants" complaints of ill-treatment by police officers (see, among many others, Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 142, ECHR 2002-IV; Biser Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 32662/06, § 80 and §§ 83-84, 10 January 2012; Nikolay Dimitrov v. Bulgaria, no. 72663/01, §§ 77-78, 27 September 2007).
  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

    LABITA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 34197/15
    As to the general principles in respect of effective investigations, the Court has set them out, among many others, in the cases of Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 24760/94, § 102, ECHR 1998-VIII) and Labita v. Italy ([GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97

    ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 34197/15
    It is noteworthy that no obvious omission to collect relevant evidence could be attributed to the authorities, in contrast with a number of cases where the Court found a violation of Article 3 on the grounds that the authorities had made a series of crucial omissions during investigations into applicants" complaints of ill-treatment by police officers (see, among many others, Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 142, ECHR 2002-IV; Biser Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 32662/06, § 80 and §§ 83-84, 10 January 2012; Nikolay Dimitrov v. Bulgaria, no. 72663/01, §§ 77-78, 27 September 2007).
  • EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 72663/01

    NIKOLAY DIMITROV c. BULGARIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 34197/15
    It is noteworthy that no obvious omission to collect relevant evidence could be attributed to the authorities, in contrast with a number of cases where the Court found a violation of Article 3 on the grounds that the authorities had made a series of crucial omissions during investigations into applicants" complaints of ill-treatment by police officers (see, among many others, Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 142, ECHR 2002-IV; Biser Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 32662/06, § 80 and §§ 83-84, 10 January 2012; Nikolay Dimitrov v. Bulgaria, no. 72663/01, §§ 77-78, 27 September 2007).
  • EGMR, 28.10.1998 - 24760/94

    ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 34197/15
    As to the general principles in respect of effective investigations, the Court has set them out, among many others, in the cases of Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 24760/94, § 102, ECHR 1998-VIII) and Labita v. Italy ([GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht