Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 34197/15 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,37472) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MITEV v. BULGARIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
MITEV v. BULGARIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 6058/10
JÓZEF WOS v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 34197/15
The fact that he was unsuccessful cannot be considered pertinent (see, similarly, Józef Wos v. Poland, no. 6058/10, § 54, 28 June 2016). - EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 32662/06
BISER KOSTOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 34197/15
It is noteworthy that no obvious omission to collect relevant evidence could be attributed to the authorities, in contrast with a number of cases where the Court found a violation of Article 3 on the grounds that the authorities had made a series of crucial omissions during investigations into applicants" complaints of ill-treatment by police officers (see, among many others, Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 142, ECHR 2002-IV; Biser Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 32662/06, § 80 and §§ 83-84, 10 January 2012; Nikolay Dimitrov v. Bulgaria, no. 72663/01, §§ 77-78, 27 September 2007). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 34197/15
As to the general principles in respect of effective investigations, the Court has set them out, among many others, in the cases of Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 24760/94, § 102, ECHR 1998-VIII) and Labita v. Italy ([GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV).
- EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 34197/15
It is noteworthy that no obvious omission to collect relevant evidence could be attributed to the authorities, in contrast with a number of cases where the Court found a violation of Article 3 on the grounds that the authorities had made a series of crucial omissions during investigations into applicants" complaints of ill-treatment by police officers (see, among many others, Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 142, ECHR 2002-IV; Biser Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 32662/06, § 80 and §§ 83-84, 10 January 2012; Nikolay Dimitrov v. Bulgaria, no. 72663/01, §§ 77-78, 27 September 2007). - EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 72663/01
NIKOLAY DIMITROV c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 34197/15
It is noteworthy that no obvious omission to collect relevant evidence could be attributed to the authorities, in contrast with a number of cases where the Court found a violation of Article 3 on the grounds that the authorities had made a series of crucial omissions during investigations into applicants" complaints of ill-treatment by police officers (see, among many others, Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 142, ECHR 2002-IV; Biser Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 32662/06, § 80 and §§ 83-84, 10 January 2012; Nikolay Dimitrov v. Bulgaria, no. 72663/01, §§ 77-78, 27 September 2007). - EGMR, 28.10.1998 - 24760/94
ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 34197/15
As to the general principles in respect of effective investigations, the Court has set them out, among many others, in the cases of Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 24760/94, § 102, ECHR 1998-VIII) and Labita v. Italy ([GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV).