Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 36043/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,37467) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
OSTROVENECS v. LATVIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
OSTROVE?...ECS v. LATVIA
Art. 3 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR - 45886/07
[FRE]
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 36043/13
This means that the authorities must make a serious attempt to find out what happened and should not rely on hasty or ill-founded conclusions to close their investigation (see Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 325, ECHR 2014 (extracts)). - EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91
RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 36043/13
In his application to the Court the applicant, referring to Ribitsch v. Austria (4 December 1995, § 34, Series A no. 336) and Mikheyev (cited above, § 127), contended that it should be presumed that he had been ill-treated by the detainee escort officers because he had sustained the injuries while he had been in custody and the State had not explained their origin. - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 36043/13
The Government drew a distinction between the present case and the case of Labita v. Italy ([GC], no. 26772/95, ECHR 2000-IV).