Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.11.2002 - 41202/98 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,38352) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MÜLLER c. SUISSE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation de l'art. 6-1 Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MÜLLER v. SWITZERLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 12.04.2001 - 41202/98
- EGMR, 05.03.2002 - 41202/98
- EGMR, 05.11.2002 - 41202/98
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2002 - 41202/98
The Court recalls that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the particular circumstances of the case and having regard to the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, in particular the complexity of the case and the conduct of the applicant and of the authorities dealing with the case as well as what was at stake for the applicant (see among other authorities Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Zimmermann and Steiner v. Switzerland judgment of 13 July 1983, Series A no. 66, p. 11, § 24). - EGMR, 13.07.1983 - 8737/79
Zimmermann und Steiner ./. Schweiz
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2002 - 41202/98
The Court recalls that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the particular circumstances of the case and having regard to the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, in particular the complexity of the case and the conduct of the applicant and of the authorities dealing with the case as well as what was at stake for the applicant (see among other authorities Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Zimmermann and Steiner v. Switzerland judgment of 13 July 1983, Series A no. 66, p. 11, § 24).