Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  JGK STATYBA LTD AND GUSELNIKOVAS v. LITHUANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  JGK Statyba Ltd and Guselnikovas v. Lithuania

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 3330/12
• EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 3330/12
• EGMR, 13.04.2016 - 3330/12

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (13)

• EGMR, 05.07.2001 - 52024/99

  ARCURI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 3330/12

  The Court further notes that in assessing whether the State struck a reasonable balance of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised, the behaviour of the owner of the property and the degree of fault or care displayed by him or her is in certain cases relevant (see AGOSI v. the United Kingdom, 24 October 1986, § 54, Series A no. 108; Arcuri v. Italy (dec.), no. 52024/99, ECHR 2001-VII).
• EGMR, 22.02.1994 - 12954/87

  RAIMONDO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 3330/12

  However, having regard to their restrictive nature, preventive measures must be brought to an end when the need for them has ceased (see: Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, § 36, Series A no. 281-A; and Vendittelli, cited above, § 40), as the more time such provisional measures stay in place, the bigger is the impact on the owner's peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
• EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75

  SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 3330/12

  The required fair balance between the protection of property rights and the requirements of the general interest will not be secured if a particular person has to bear a personal and excessive burden (see Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, §§ 69-73, Series A no. 52).

 
• EGMR, 24.10.1986 - 9118/80

  AGOSI c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 3330/12

  The Court further notes that in assessing whether the State struck a reasonable balance of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised, the behaviour of the owner of the property and the degree of fault or care displayed by him or her is in certain cases relevant (see AGOSI v. the United Kingdom, 24 October 1986, § 54, Series A no. 108; Arcuri v. Italy (dec.), no. 52024/99, ECHR 2001-VII).
• EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12742/87

  PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD ET AUTRES c. IRLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 3330/12

  Even assuming that the applicant company could have sued the parties to the proceedings who had requested the application of provisional measures in respect of the company's property, according to the Court's case-law suing a private individual cannot be regarded as a remedy in respect of an act of the State (see Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland, judgment of 29 November 1991, § 48, Series A no. 222; and Zlínsat, spol. s r.o., v. Bulgaria, no. 57785/00, § 55, 15 June 2006).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 3330/12

  The Court will examine whether the length of the proceedings was compatible with the requirements of Article 6 § 1. The Court reiterates that the question whether the length of proceedings is "reasonable" must be assessed in accordance with the circumstances of the case and the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the behaviour of the applicant and that of the competent authorities, and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 05.05.1995 - 18465/91

  AIR CANADA c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 3330/12

  The Court does not therefore consider that the case involves a deprivation of property (see, mutatis mutandis, Air Canada v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 5 May 1995, § 33, Series A no. 316-A).
• EGMR, 15.10.1999 - 26614/95

  HUMEN c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 3330/12

  The Court reiterates that only delays attributable to the State may justify a finding of non-compliance with the "reasonable time" requirement (see Humen v. Poland, no. 26614/95, § 66, judgment of 15 October 1999).
• EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73

  König ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 3330/12

  However, this decision must be proportionate, given the special circumstances of the case (see König v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 1978, Series A no. 27, § 110, and Herbst v. Germany, no. 20027/02, § 78, 11 January 2007).
• EGMR, 22.05.2001 - 33592/96

  BAUMANN v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 3330/12

  Moreover, the assessment of whether domestic remedies had to be exhausted is normally carried out with reference to the date on which the application was lodged with the Court (see Baumann v. France, no. 33592/96, § 47, ECHR 2001-V (extracts), and Scordino, cited above, § 144).
• EGMR, 28.09.1995 - 12868/87

  SPADEA ET SCALABRINO c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 73049/01

  Budweiser-Streit
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 22774/93

  IMMOBILIARE SAFFI v. ITALY

• EGMR, 14.10.2014 - 31102/06

  PAPLAUSKIENE v. LITHUANIA

  The Court accepts the applicant's argument and considers that the situation inevitably caused a certain amount of inconvenience to her, particularly given her old age and health condition, and negatively affected her property rights (compare JGK Statyba Ltd and Guselnikovas v. Lithuania, no. 3330/12, §§ 128-130, 5 November 2013).