Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ANCHEV v. BULGARIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ANCHEV v. BULGARIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (23)

• EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 58911/00

  Rechtssache L. e.V. u.a gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 38334/08

  In its reputational aspect, which was the one at issue in those proceedings, that right was "civil" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 (see Turek, cited above, § 82, and, mutatis mutandis, Kurzac v. Poland (dec.), no. 31382/96, ECHR 2000-VI, and Leela Förderkreis e.V. and Others v. Germany, no. 58911/00, §§ 45-47, 6 November 2008).
• EGMR, 10.09.2013 - 663/11

  NEDYALKOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 38334/08

  A court which does not go into facts or issues because they are immaterial under the substantive rules applicable to the case before it does not fall short of that requirement (for illustrations of this point, albeit in different contexts, see Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, §§ 94-101, ECHR 2001-V; Nedyalkov and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 663/11, § 111, 10 September 2013; and Galina Kostova v. Bulgaria, no. 36181/05, §§ 61 and 64, 12 November 2013).
• EGMR, 21.09.1994 - 17101/90

  FAYED c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 38334/08

  Holding otherwise would be tantamount to deriving particular content for substantive domestic legal rights from Article 6 § 1, which is not permissible (see, among other authorities, James and Others, cited above, § 81; Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, § 65, Series A no. 294-B; and Z and Others v. the United Kingdom, cited above, §§ 87 and 98).

 
• EGMR, 16.04.2013 - 40908/05

  FAZLIYSKI v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 38334/08

  One of the requirements flowing from Article 6 § 1 of the Convention is that a "tribunal" which determines "civil rights and obligations" must be able to examine all questions of fact and law which are relevant to the case before it (see Fazliyski v. Bulgaria, no. 40908/05, § 57, 16 April 2013, with further references).
• EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 35601/04

  POCIUS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 38334/08

  There was a dispute before the courts as to whether the two 2014 decisions of the Commission relating to the applicant were lawful, and those decisions directly affected his right to respect for his private life, which is protected under both Article 32 § 1 of the Bulgarian Constitution - a provision which has, albeit in different contexts, been given direct effect in civil litigation before the Bulgarian courts (see paragraphs 28 and 29 above) - and Article 8 of the Convention, which is directly applicable in Bulgarian law (see paragraph 27 above, and compare with Ravon and Others v. France, no. 18497/03, § 24 in fine, 21 February 2008, and Pocius v. Lithuania, no. 35601/04, § 42, 6 July 2010).
• EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 36181/05

  GALINA KOSTOVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 38334/08

  A court which does not go into facts or issues because they are immaterial under the substantive rules applicable to the case before it does not fall short of that requirement (for illustrations of this point, albeit in different contexts, see Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, §§ 94-101, ECHR 2001-V; Nedyalkov and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 663/11, § 111, 10 September 2013; and Galina Kostova v. Bulgaria, no. 36181/05, §§ 61 and 64, 12 November 2013).
• EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 51362/99

  ENEVA AND DOBREV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 38334/08

  43278/98, 45437/99, 48014/99, 48380/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01 and 194/02, §§ 179-80, 15 March 2007, and, specifically in relation to the records of the former security services, Kamburov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 14336/05, § 55, 6 November 2011).
• EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98

  VELIKOVI AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 38334/08

  43278/98, 45437/99, 48014/99, 48380/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01 and 194/02, §§ 179-80, 15 March 2007, and, specifically in relation to the records of the former security services, Kamburov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 14336/05, § 55, 6 November 2011).
• EGMR, 14.05.2013 - 15189/10

  CICHOPEK AND OTHERS v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 38334/08

  15189/10 and 1, 627 other applications, § 143, 14 May 2013).
• EGMR, 06.01.2011 - 14336/05

  KAMBUROV v. BULGARIA (II)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 38334/08

  43278/98, 45437/99, 48014/99, 48380/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01 and 194/02, §§ 179-80, 15 March 2007, and, specifically in relation to the records of the former security services, Kamburov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 14336/05, § 55, 6 November 2011).
• EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 59330/00
• EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 73465/01

  TZILEVI v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 02.09.2008 - 17625/05

  CHODYNICKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 22.11.2001 - 41111/98

  Entlassung einer Kindergärtnerin wegen Stasi-Tätigkeit - Verwendung von …
• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

  Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …
• EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 53367/99

  STOYANOVA AND IVANOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 21.10.2014 - 38162/07

  NAIDIN c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 57986/00

  TUREK c. SLOVAQUIE
• EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 76136/12

  RAMADAN v. MALTA
• EGMR, 26.03.1987 - 9248/81

  LEANDER c. SUÈDE
• EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 194/02

  NIKOLOVI v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 24.04.2008 - 48380/99

  TODOROVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 22.04.2013 - 48876/08

  Verbot politischer Fernsehwerbung

• EGMR, 09.03.2023 - 36345/16

  L.B. v. HUNGARY

  La Cour a souligné que l'inexactitude ou la fausseté des informations contenues dans des registres publics sont susceptibles de porter atteinte à la réputation de la personne concernée ou de lui être préjudiciables (Cemalettin Canli c. Turquie, no 22427/04, § 35, 18 novembre 2008, Khelili c. Suisse, no 16188/07, § 64, 18 octobre 2011, et Rotaru c. Roumanie [GC], no 28341/95, § 44, CEDH 2000-V), et qu'il est nécessaire que des garanties procédurales soient prévues par la loi pour que lesdites informations puissent être corrigées ou révisées (Cemalettin Canli, précité, §§ 41-42 ; voir aussi Anchev c. Bulgarie (déc.), nos 38334/08 et 68242/16, 5 décembre 2017).
• EGMR - 68242/16 (anhängig)

  ANCHEV v. BULGARIA

  The facts of the case have been set out in the Statement of facts in application no. 38334/08, notice of which was given to the Bulgarian Government on 15 November 2016.

  The relevant domestic law has likewise been set out in the Statement of facts in application no. 38334/08.

• EGMR, 27.06.2019 - 13290/11

  SVIT ROZVAG, TOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  No such reasons were ever put forward at the stage of judicial review (ibid., § 122; and contrast Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720/99 and 2 others, § 116, ECHR 2005-VI, and in the context of Articles 10 and 8 respectively, Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, §§ 13-33 and 113-16, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Anchev v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 38334/08 and 68242/16, § 104, 5 December 2017).