Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RIBAC v. SLOVENIA

  Violation of Article 14+P1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  RIBAC v. SLOVENIA and 1 application

  Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 57101/10, 57123/10
• EGMR, 14.11.2018 - 57101/10

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 37452/02

  STUMMER c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 57101/10

  If, however, a Contracting State has in force legislation providing for the payment as of right of a welfare benefit - whether conditional or not on the prior payment of contributions - that legislation must be regarded as generating a propriety interest falling within the ambit of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 for persons satisfying its requirements (see Stummer v. Austria [GC], no. 37452/02, § 82, ECHR 2011).
• EGMR, 15.09.2016 - 44818/11

  BRITISH GURKHA WELFARE SOCIETY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 57101/10

  A wide margin is usually allowed to the State under the Convention when it comes to general measures of economic or social strategy (see British Gurkha Welfare Society and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 44818/11, § 62, 15 September 2016).
• EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 62649/10

  Türkei verurteilt - Aleviten diskriminiert

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 57101/10

  The Contracting States enjoy a certain margin of appreciation in assessing whether and to what extent differences in otherwise similar situations justify a difference in treatment (see Izzettin Dogan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 156, ECHR 2016).

 
• EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 6717/08

  RUSZKOWSKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 57101/10

  According to the Court's established case-law, the principles which apply generally in cases concerning Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 are equally relevant when it comes to welfare benefits (see Andrejeva, cited above, § 77, and more recently, Ruszkowska v. Poland, no. 6717/08, § 48, 1 July 2014).
• EGMR, 18.02.2009 - 55707/00

  Andrejeva ./. Lettland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 57101/10

  It is necessary but it is also sufficient for the facts of the case to fall "within the ambit" of one or more of the Convention Articles (see, among many other authorities, Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707/00, § 74, ECHR 2009, and Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943/11, § 162, ECHR 2016 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 60367/08

  Khamtokhu und Aksenchik ./. Russland: Lebenslange Freiheitsstrafe nur für Männer …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 57101/10

  60367/08 and 961/11, § 58, ECHR 2017).