Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.01.2005 - 5379/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,47384) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 06.01.2005 - 5379/02
- EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 5379/02
- EGMR, 02.12.2011 - 5379/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25642/94
Anforderungen an die unverzügliche Vorführung der festgenommenen Person i.S.d. …
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.01.2005 - 5379/02
In Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-III, the Court held as follows (case-law references omitted):. - EGMR, 06.05.1985 - 8658/79
Bönisch ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.01.2005 - 5379/02
Referring to the Court's case-law under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention by analogy, and particular to the Bönisch v. Austria judgment of 6 May 1985, Series A no. 92, pp. - EGMR, 12.05.1992 - 13770/88
MEGYERI c. ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.01.2005 - 5379/02
d) Article 5 § 4 requires that the procedure followed have a judicial character and give to the individual concerned guarantees appropriate to the kind of deprivation of liberty in question; in order to determine whether a proceeding provides adequate guarantees, regard must be had to the particular nature of the circumstances in which such proceeding takes place (see Megyeri v. Germany, judgment of 12 May 1992, Series A no. 237-A, p. 11, § 22). - EGMR, 05.11.1981 - 7215/75
X v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.01.2005 - 5379/02
Admittedly, deprivation of liberty can fall within the ambit of both Article 5 § 1 (a) and Article 5 § 1 (e) but no problem arises in the present case as regards compliance with the requirements of sub-paragraph a (see X v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 5 November 1981, Series A no. 46, pp. 17-18, § 39).