Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KAYIPLAR AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS

  Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 35 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 10.05.2005 - 34698/04

  HACKETT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.01.2015 - 42153/14

  Even where events took place far in the past, it is possible that new developments occur such that a fresh obligation to investigate arises, for example, newly-discovered evidence comes to light (Brecknell v. the United Kingdom (no. 32457/04, §§ 73-75, 27 November 2007); Hackett v United Kingdom (no. 34698/04, (dec.) 10 May 2005); Gasyak and Others v. Turkey (no. 27872/03, 13 October 2009)).

  The Court notes that the procedural obligation under Article 2 does not require applicants to have access to police files, or copies of all documents during an ongoing inquiry, or for them to be consulted or informed about every step (McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, ECHR 2001-III, § 121; Green v. the United Kingdom, no. 28079/04, (dec.) 19 May 2005; Hackett v. the United Kingdom, (dec.) 34698/04, 10 May 2005).

• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.01.2015 - 42153/14

  The Court's case-law establishes that the obligation to protect the right to life under this provision, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 of the Convention to "secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force by, inter alios, agents of the State (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 161, Series A no. 324).
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

  McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.01.2015 - 42153/14

  The Court notes that the procedural obligation under Article 2 does not require applicants to have access to police files, or copies of all documents during an ongoing inquiry, or for them to be consulted or informed about every step (McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, ECHR 2001-III, § 121; Green v. the United Kingdom, no. 28079/04, (dec.) 19 May 2005; Hackett v. the United Kingdom, (dec.) 34698/04, 10 May 2005).

 
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

  AVSAR c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.01.2015 - 42153/14

  The obligation is of means only, not result (Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 394, ECHR 2001-VII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 28079/04

  GREEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.01.2015 - 42153/14

  The Court notes that the procedural obligation under Article 2 does not require applicants to have access to police files, or copies of all documents during an ongoing inquiry, or for them to be consulted or informed about every step (McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, ECHR 2001-III, § 121; Green v. the United Kingdom, no. 28079/04, (dec.) 19 May 2005; Hackett v. the United Kingdom, (dec.) 34698/04, 10 May 2005).
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.01.2015 - 42153/14

  The essential purpose of such an investigation is to secure the effective implementation of the domestic laws safeguarding the right to life and, in those cases involving State agents or bodies, to ensure their accountability for deaths occurring under their responsibility (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 110, ECHR 2005­VII).
• EGMR, 04.01.2007 - 18727/06

  SZULA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.01.2015 - 42153/14

  There is no right however to obtain a prosecution or conviction (e.g. Szula v. the United Kingdom, (dec.) no. 18727/06, 4 January 2007) and the fact that an investigation ends without concrete, or with only limited, results is not indicative of any failings as such.
• EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 66758/09

  FAZLIC AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.01.2015 - 42153/14

  16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90, §§ 161, 192, ECHR 2009; Fazlic v Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 66758/09, (dec.) 3 June 2014, § 39).