Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 27473/02 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ERDOGAN YAGIZ c. TURQUIE
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Exception préliminaire retenue (délai de six mois) Exception préliminaire non examinée (non-épuisement des voies de recours internes) Violation de l'art. 3 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 8 Partiellement irrecevable Dommage matériel et préjudice moral - réparation ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ERDOGAN YAGIZ v. TURKEY
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Preliminary objection allowed (six month period) Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage and non-pecuniary damage - financial award (global) ...
Wird zitiert von ... (23) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 27.09.1999 - 33985/96
SMITH AND GRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 27473/02
It has also deemed treatment to be "degrading" because it was such as to arouse in the victims feelings of fear, anguish and inferiority capable of humiliating and debasing them and possibly breaking their physical or moral resistance (see Ireland v. the United Kingdom, cited above, § 167; Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985/96 and 33986/96, § 120, ECHR 1999-VI; and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 92, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95
PEERS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 27473/02
However, the absence of any such purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of Article 3 (see, for example, Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 101, ECHR 2002-VI). - EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99
Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 27473/02
However, the absence of any such purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of Article 3 (see, for example, Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 101, ECHR 2002-VI).
- EGMR, 10.02.1983 - 7299/75
ALBERT ET LE COMPTE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 27473/02
In considering whether a punishment or treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, the Court will have regard to whether its object was to humiliate and debase the person concerned and whether, as far as the consequences are concerned, it adversely affected his or her personality in a manner incompatible with Article 3 (see Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium, 10 February 1983, § 22, Series A no. 58). - EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89
KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 27473/02
Lastly, allegations of ill-treatment must be supported before the Court by appropriate evidence (see, mutatis mutandis, Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, § 30, Series A no. 269). - EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94
Mord an James Bulger
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 27473/02
In order for a punishment or treatment to be "inhuman" or "degrading", the suffering or humiliation involved must in any event go beyond that inevitable element of suffering or humiliation connected with a given form of legitimate treatment or punishment (see V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999-IX). - EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 27473/02
Moreover, it may well suffice that the victim is humiliated in his or her own eyes, even if not in the eyes of others (see Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, § 32, Series A no. 26, and Smith and Grady, cited above, § 120).
- EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 38004/12
Mariya Alekhina u.a. ./. Russland - "Pussy Riot"-Urteil verletzt Meinungsfreiheit
The public nature of the treatment may be a relevant or an aggravating factor in assessing whether it is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3 (see, inter alia, Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, § 32, Series A no. 26; Erdogan Yagiz v. Turkey, no. 27473/02, § 37, 6 March 2007; and Kummer v. the Czech Republic, no. 32133/11, § 64, 25 July 2013). - EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 61243/08
ELBERTE v. LATVIA
The public nature of the treatment may be a relevant or aggravating factor in assessing whether it is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3 (see, inter alia, Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, § 32, Series A no. 26; ErdoÄŸan Yağız v. Turkey, no. 27473/02, § 37, 6 March 2007; and Kummer v. the Czech Republic, no. 32133/11, § 64, 25 July 2013). - EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 32541/08
Keine Käfige für Angeklagte
Le caractère public du traitement peut être une circonstance pertinente ou aggravante pour apprécier s'il est « dégradant'au sens de l'article 3 (voir, entre autres, Tyrer c. Royaume-Uni, 25 avril 1978, § 32, série A no 26, ErdoÄŸan Yağız c. Turquie, no 27473/02, § 37, 6 mars 2007, et Kummer c. République tchèque, no 32133/11, § 64, 25 juillet 2013).
- EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 29787/03
RIAD ET IDIAB c. BELGIQUE
Toutefois, il peut fort bien suffire que la victime soit humiliée à ses propres yeux, même si elle ne l'est pas à ceux d'autrui (voir Tyrer c. Royaume-Uni, arrêt du 25 avril 1978, série A no 26, § 32, Smith et Grady c. Royaume-Uni, nos 33985/96 et 33986/96, § 120, CEDH 1999-VI, et Erdogan Yagiz c. Turquie, no 27473/02, § 37, 6 mars 2007). - EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 33810/07
ASSOCIATION
A cet égard, elle rappelle qu'un mauvais traitement doit atteindre un minimum de gravité pour tomber sous le coup de l'article 3. L'appréciation de ce minimum est relative par essence ; elle dépend de l'ensemble des données de la cause, et notamment de la durée du traitement, de ses effets physiques et mentaux ainsi que, parfois, du sexe, de l'âge et de l'état de santé de la victime (Labita c. Italie [GC], no 26772/95, § 120, CEDH 2000-IV, ErdoÄŸan Yağız c. Turquie, no 27473/02, § 35, CEDH 2007-III (extraits)). - EGMR, 26.11.2019 - 58502/11
ABDYUSHEVA ET AUTRES c. RUSSIE
Le seuil de gravité requis par l'article 3 semble atteint même en l'absence d'actes de violences physiques à l'égard des requérants (§ 161 de l'arrêt ; voir, par exemple, Erdogan Yagiz c. Turquie, no 27473/02, § 43, 6 mars 2007). - EGMR, 11.06.2009 - 53541/07
S.D. c. GRECE
Toutefois, il peut fort bien suffire que la victime soit humiliée à ses propres yeux, même si elle ne l'est pas à ceux d'autrui (voir Tyrer c. Royaume-Uni, arrêt du 25 avril 1978, série A no 26, § 32, Smith et Grady c. Royaume-Uni, nos 33985/96 et 33986/96, § 120, CEDH 1999-VI, Erdogan Yagiz c. Turquie, no 27473/02, § 37, 6 mars 2007 et Riad et Idiab c. Belgique, no 29787/03 et 29810/03, §§ 95-96, 24 janvier 2008). - EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 2653/13
YAROSLAV BELOUSOV v. RUSSIA
The public nature of the treatment may be a relevant or an aggravating factor in assessing whether it is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention (see, inter alia, Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, § 32, Series A no. 26; Erdogan Yagiz v. Turkey, no. 27473/02, § 37, 6 March 2007; and Kummer v. the Czech Republic, no. 32133/11, § 64, 25 July 2013). - EGMR, 10.11.2020 - 75186/12
Russland muss Nawalny Entschädigung zahlen
Moreover, the treatment in question took place in public in the presence of a large number of people and was reported in the media (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 115, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Raninen v. Finland, 16 December 1997, § 55, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VIII; and Erdogan Yagiz v. Turkey, no. 27473/02, § 37, 6 March 2007). - EGMR, 14.06.2011 - 36921/07
MIROSLAW GARLICKI v. POLAND
In this regard, it is of importance for instance whether there is reason to believe that the person concerned would resist arrest or abscond, cause injury or damage or suppress evidence (see Raninen v. Finland, 16 December 1997, § 56, Reports 1997-VIII; ErdoÄ?an YaÄ?ız v. Turkey, no. 27473/02, § 42, ECHR 2007-III (extracts); Kazakova v. Bulgaria, no. 55061/00, § 53, 22 June 2006; and Wieser v. Austria, no. 2293/03, § 37, 22 February 2007). - EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 36479/03
COLESNICOV c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 61258/10
CARPEN c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 37379/02
POP BLAGA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 23.01.2020 - 35121/09
YURIY KOVAL v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 23229/11
KARACHENTSEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.03.2013 - 43750/05
PATRICIU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 10425/09
ACATRINEI c. ROUMANIE ET AUTRES REQUETES
- EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 39229/03
FYODOROV AND FYODOROVA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 39756/07
SHYTI v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 07.11.2019 - 64581/16
NATIG JAFAROV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 27566/06
MUSA YILMAZ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 31950/05
GÖKHAN YILDIRIM v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 74307/01
GÖK AND GÜLER v. TURKEY