Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 6239/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,68847) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 18.12.1996 - 21987/93
AKSOY c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 6239/06
While this means that complaints intended to be brought subsequently before the Court should have been made to the appropriate domestic body, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements laid down in domestic law, it is not required that recourse should be had to remedies which would be inadequate or ineffective (e.g. Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, no. 21893/93, §§ 65-67, ECHR 1996-IV; Aksoy v. Turkey, no. 21987/93, §§ 51-52, ECHR 1996-VI). - EGMR, 03.10.2000 - 28369/95
CAMP ET BOURIMI c. PAYS-BAS
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 6239/06
Insofar as the applicant complains under Article 14 of the Convention that he was discriminated against in that prisoners who had obtained a release date could waive the re-opening of the punishment part, the Court considers that prisoners who have been approved for release and in preparation for an expected release date cannot be regarded as in a comparable situation to prisoners who have only been told when they will first become eligible for release on parole and that any difference in treatment may also be regarded as having objective and reasonable justification, given the very strong expectations of release enjoyed by the former prisoners and their families (see concerning general principles, inter alia, Camp and Bourimi v. the Netherlands, no. 28369/95, § 37, ECHR 2000-X ). - EGMR, 28.05.2002 - 46295/99
STAFFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 6239/06
This procedure encompasses not only conviction but sentencing (Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, pp. 34-35, §§ 76-77) and, as pointed out by the applicant, the fixing of the punishment part of a mandatory life sentence is akin to a sentencing procedure and also falls within the scope of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295/99, § 87, ECHR 2002-IV, § 87). - EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 6239/06
This procedure encompasses not only conviction but sentencing (Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, pp. 34-35, §§ 76-77) and, as pointed out by the applicant, the fixing of the punishment part of a mandatory life sentence is akin to a sentencing procedure and also falls within the scope of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295/99, § 87, ECHR 2002-IV, § 87).