Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GEBURA v. POLAND

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-1 Remainder inadmissible Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 28358/95

  BARANOWSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 63131/00

  The Court must moreover ascertain whether domestic law itself is in conformity with the Convention, including the general principles expressed or implied therein (see, among many other authorities, Winterwerp, cited above, pp. 19-20, § 45, and Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, § 51, ECHR 2000-III).
• EGMR, 14.06.2005 - 61444/00

  KRASUSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 63131/00

  The relevant domestic law and practice concerning the State's liability for torts committed by its officials are set out in paragraphs 34-37 of the Court's judgment in the case of Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, ECHR 2005-V (extracts).
• EKMR, 06.12.1977 - 7648/76

  X. c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 63131/00

  It is true that the Convention does not guarantee a right to have a penalty imposed by a court in criminal proceedings suspended for a probationary period (see X v. Switzerland, no. 7648/76, Commission decision of 6 December 1977, Decisions and Reports 11, p. 190).

 
• EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73

  WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 63131/00

  That right is of primary importance in a "democratic society" within the meaning of the Convention (see De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, judgment of 18 June 1971, Series A no. 12, p. 36, § 65, and Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, p. 16, § 37).
• EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9787/82

  WEEKS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 63131/00

  All persons are entitled to the protection of that right, that is to say, not to be deprived, or to continue to be deprived, of their liberty (see Weeks v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 114, p. 22, § 40), save in accordance with the conditions specified in paragraph 1 of Article 5. The list of exceptions set out in Article 5 § 1 is an exhaustive one and only a narrow interpretation of those exceptions is consistent with the aim of that provision, namely to ensure that no one is arbitrarily deprived of his or her liberty (see Amuur v. France, judgment of 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, p. 848, § 42; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 170, ECHR 2000-IV; and Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 170, ECHR 2004-II).
• EGMR, 22.03.1995 - 18580/91

  QUINN c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 63131/00

  However, the national authorities must attempt to keep it to a minimum (Quinn v. France, judgment of 22 March 1995, Series A no. 311, p. 17, § 42; Giulia Manzoni v. Italy, judgment of 1 July 1997, Reports 1997-IV, p. 1191, § 25 in fine; K.-F. v. Germany, judgment of 27 November 1997, Reports 1997-VII, p. 2675, § 71; and Mancini v. Italy, no. 44955/98, § 24, ECHR 2001-IX).

• EGMR, 18.03.2008 - 11036/03

  LADENT v. POLAND

  La Cour rappelle que les formalités administratives liées à la libération ne peuvent justifier un délai de plus de quelques heures (Labita, précité ; Nikolov c. Bulgarie, no 38884/97, § 82, 30 janvier 2003, et Gebura c. Pologne, no 63131/00, § 34, 6 mars 2007).
• EGMR, 08.09.2011 - 33108/05

  OSHURKO c. UKRAINE

  Cependant, les autorités nationales doivent essayer de le réduire au minimum (Giulia Manzoni c. Italie, 1er juillet 1997, Recueil 1997-IV, § 25), les formalités administratives liées à la libération ne pouvant justifier qu'un retard de quelques heures (Gebura c. Pologne, no 63131/00, § 34, 6 mars 2007).
• EGMR, 05.07.2022 - 13136/20

  PENIU c. ROUMANIE

  Si un certain délai pour l'exécution d'une décision de remise en liberté est souvent inévitable, il faut qu'il soit réduit au minimum (Giulia Manzoni c. Italie, 1er juillet 1997, § 25, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1997-IV, Gebura c. Pologne, no 63131/00, § 34, 6 mars 2007, et Ogica c. Roumanie, no 24708/03, § 61, 27 mai 2010).