Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GAVAZOV v. BULGARIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 6, Art. 13, Art. 13+6 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial Violation of Article 13+6 - Right to an ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 15.05.2006 - 54659/00
• EGMR, 06.03.2008 - 54659/00

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2008 - 54659/00

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2008 - 54659/00

  However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII, and Fedotov v. Russia, no. 5140/02, § 59, 25 October 2005).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2008 - 54659/00

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, among others, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 90, ECHR 2000-XI, and Poltoratskiy v. Ukraine, no. 38812/97, § 130, ECHR 2003-V).

 
• EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

  PEERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2008 - 54659/00

  The Court considers that subjecting a detainee to the embarrassment of having to relieve himself in a bucket in the presence of his cellmates and of being present while the same bucket was being used by them (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 75, ECHR 2001-III; I.I. v. Bulgaria, no. 44082/98, § 75, 9 June 2005; Kalashnikov, § 99; and Kehayov, § 71, both cited above) cannot be deemed warranted, except in specific situations where allowing visits to the sanitary facilities would pose concrete and serious security risks.
• EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99

  Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2008 - 54659/00

  The question whether the purpose of the treatment was to humiliate or debase the victim is a further factor to be taken into account, but the absence of any such purpose cannot conclusively rule out a violation of Article 3 (see Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 95 and 101, ECHR 2002-VI).
• EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 38822/97

  Recht auf Freiheit und Sicherheit (zur Wahrnehmung richterlicher Aufgaben …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2008 - 54659/00

  The Court notes that the complaint is similar to those in previous cases against Bulgaria where violations were found (see, for example, Ilijkov, cited above, §§ 67-87, and Shishkov v. Bulgaria, no. 38822/97, §§ 57-67, ECHR 2003-I (extracts)).
• EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 50901/99

  VAN DER VEN v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2008 - 54659/00

  In assessing whether a restrictive regime may amount to treatment contrary to Article 3 in a given case, regard must be had to the particular conditions, the stringency of the regime, its duration, the objective pursued and its effects on the person concerned (see Kehayov, § 65, and Iovchev, § 128, both cited above; and, mutatis mutandis, Van der Ven v. the Netherlands, no. 50901/99, § 51, ECHR 2003-II).
• EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 38812/97

  POLTORATSKIY v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2008 - 54659/00

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, among others, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 90, ECHR 2000-XI, and Poltoratskiy v. Ukraine, no. 38812/97, § 130, ECHR 2003-V).
• EGMR, 11.12.2003 - 39084/97

  YANKOV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2008 - 54659/00

  The relevant provisions of the CCP and the Bulgarian courts" practice before 1 January 2000 are summarised in the Court's judgments in several similar cases (see, among others, Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, §§ 25-36, ECHR 1999-II, Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, §§ 55-59, 26 July 2001; and Yankov v. Bulgaria, no. 39084/97, §§ 79-88, ECHR 2003-XII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 44082/98

  I.I. v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2008 - 54659/00

  The Court considers that subjecting a detainee to the embarrassment of having to relieve himself in a bucket in the presence of his cellmates and of being present while the same bucket was being used by them (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 75, ECHR 2001-III; I.I. v. Bulgaria, no. 44082/98, § 75, 9 June 2005; Kalashnikov, § 99; and Kehayov, § 71, both cited above) cannot be deemed warranted, except in specific situations where allowing visits to the sanitary facilities would pose concrete and serious security risks.

• EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 31244/06

  LOVEIKA v. LITHUANIA

  That being so, in assessing evidence, the Court has generally applied the standard of proof "beyond reasonable doubt" (see, as a recent authority, Gavazov v. Bulgaria, no. 54659/00, § 93, 6 March 2008).