Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HALL v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Hall v. Austria

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 5455/06

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73

  König ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 5455/06

  The period to be taken into consideration began on 15 December 1997, when the DAA rejected the applicant's request for a declaration that no authoritative permit by the agricultural authorities was necessary for the transfer of the grazing and hut rights, as it was at that moment that a "dispute" arose within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, § 98, Series A no. 27 and Morscher v. Austria, no. 54039/00, § 38, 5 February 2004).

• EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 36871/11

  GH IMMOBILIENMAKLER GMBH v. AUSTRIA

  The applicant company's complaint relates to the length of the proceedings, which began on 1 September 2006, when the Vienna Municipality prohibited the construction of the buildings (see paragraph 7 above; and see Hall v. Austria, no. 5455/06, § 42, 6 March 2012, with further references), and ended on 7 April 2011, when the final decision of the Administrative Court was served on the applicant company's counsel (see paragraph 14 above).
• EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 20527/13

  DÖLLER v. AUSTRIA

  The applicants" complaint relates to the length of the proceedings, which began on 6 October 2005, when the Mayor dismissed the applicants" request for an exemption from the obligation to connect to the public sewage (see paragraph 8 above; see Hall v. Austria, no. 5455/06, § 42, 6 March 2012, with further references), and ended on 11 September 2012, when the final decision of the Administrative Court was served on the applicants" counsel (see paragraph 22 above).