Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2000,29504
EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97 (https://dejure.org/2000,29504)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06.04.2000 - 35382/97 (https://dejure.org/2000,29504)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06. April 2000 - 35382/97 (https://dejure.org/2000,29504)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2000,29504) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (257)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 08.12.1999 - 23885/94

    FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY PARTY (ÖZDEP) v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97
    Furthermore, in the Freedom and Democracy Party (ÖZDEP) case, the Court awarded the applicant, a political party, compensation for non-pecuniary damage on account of the frustration its members and founders had suffered as a result of a violation of Article 11 of the Convention (see Freedom and Democracy Party (ÖZDEP) v. Turkey [GC], no. 23885/94, § 57, ECHR 1999-VIII).

    It is obvious that in so doing the Court relies on the precedent of Freedom and Democracy Party (ÖZDEP) v. Turkey ([GC], no. 23885/94, ECHR 1999-VIII) to answer the submission of the Portuguese Government that non-pecuniary compensation in length of proceedings cases "was to provide reparation for anxiety, the mental stress of having to wait for the outcome of the case and uncertainty... feelings [which] were peculiar to individuals and could under no circumstances entitle a company to compensation".

  • EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 22774/93

    IMMOBILIARE SAFFI v. ITALY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97
    The Court points out in that connection that in the Immobiliare Saffi case it did not consider it necessary in the light of the circumstances of the case to examine whether a commercial company could allege that it had sustained non-pecuniary damage as a result of anxiety (Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 79, ECHR 1999-V).
  • EGMR, 09.06.1988 - 9840/82

    B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (ARTICLE 50)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97
    In addition, if one or more heads of damage cannot be calculated precisely or if the distinction between pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage proves difficult, the Court may decide to make a global assessment (see the B. v. the United Kingdom (Article 50) judgment of 9 June 1988, Series A no. 136-D, pp.
  • EGMR, 19.12.1994 - 15153/89

    VEREINIGUNG DEMOKRATISCHER SOLDATEN ÖSTERREICHS AND GUBI v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97
    Thus, in Vereinigung demokratischer Soldaten Österreichs and Gubi v. Austria, the Court accepted that the first applicant, an association, may have suffered non-pecuniary damage as a result of a violation of Articles 10 and 13 of the Convention (see the judgment of 19 December 1994, Series A no. 302, p. 21, § 62).
  • EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

    GUZZARDI v. ITALY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97
    The Court enjoys a certain discretion in the exercise of that power, as the adjective "just" and the phrase "if necessary" attest (see the Guzzardi v. Italy judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, p. 42, § 114).
  • EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88

    DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97
    32-33, §§ 10-12, and the Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1993, Series A no. 274, pp.
  • EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 22947/13

    News-Portal: Keine Haftung für Nutzerkommentare

    As the Court has previously held in the context of compensation for the protraction of civil proceedings, juristic persons may be awarded compensation for non-pecuniary damage, where consideration should be given to the company's reputation (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 35, ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 16.04.2002 - 37971/97

    STES COLAS EST AND OTHERS v. FRANCE

    As regards the rights secured to companies by the Convention, it should be pointed out that the Court has already recognised a company's right under Article 41 to compensation for non-pecuniary damage sustained as a result of a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Comingersoll v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, §§ 33-35, ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 07.06.2012 - 38433/09

    CENTRO EUROPA 7 S.R.L. AND DI STEFANO v. ITALY

    Aspects that may be taken into account include the company's reputation, uncertainty in decision-planning, disruption in the management of the company (for which there is no precise method of calculating the consequences) and lastly, albeit to a lesser degree, the anxiety and inconvenience caused to the members of the management team (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal, [GC], no. 35382/97, § 35, ECHR 2000-IV).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht