Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MUSTAFA AND ARMAGAN AKIN v. TURKEY

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 8 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 24.03.1988 - 10465/83

  OLSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2010 - 4694/03

  Likewise, the Court considers that family life within the meaning of the same provision also exists between the second applicant ArmaÄ?an and his sister Damla, with whom he lived in the same house until the divorce of his parents in 2000 (see, inter alia, Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1), 24 March 1988, § 81, Series A no. 130).
• EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 23499/06

  HAVELKA ET AUTRES c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2010 - 4694/03

  Moreover, an assessment of the quality of the decision-makıng process requires the Court to establish whether the conclusions of the domestic authorities had a sufficient evidentiary basis (including, as appropriate, statements by witnesses, reports by competent authorities, psychological and other expert assessments and medical notes) and whether the interested parties, including the children themselves, were able to express their views (see, for example, Havelka and Others v. the Czech Republic, no. 23499/06, § 62, 21 June 2007; Haase v. Germany, no. 11057/02, § 97, ECHR 2004-III (extracts)).
• EGMR, 11.07.2000 - 29192/95

  Ausländer, Aufenthaltserlaubnis, Ausweisung, Familienangehörige, Kinder, Schutz …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2010 - 4694/03

  Such a natural family relationship is not terminated by reason of the fact that the parents separate or divorce, as a result of which the child ceases to live with one of its parents (see Cılız v. the Netherlands, no. 29192/95, § 59, ECHR 2000-VIII and the cases cited therein).
• EGMR, 16.04.2002 - 37971/97

  STES COLAS EST AND OTHERS v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2010 - 4694/03

  In response to the Government's argument concerning the costs and expenses relating to the proceedings at the national level, the Court reiterates that, if it finds that there has been a violation of the Convention, it may award the applicant the costs and expenses incurred before the national courts for the prevention or redress of the violation (see Société Colas Est and Others v. France, no. 37971/97, § 56, ECHR 2002-III, and the cases cited therein).
• EGMR, 26.02.2002 - 46544/99

  Fall K. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2010 - 4694/03

  At this juncture the Court reiterates that, contrary to the Government's submission, the mutual enjoyment by parents and children of each other's company constitutes a fundamental element of "family life" within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention (see Kutzner v. Germany, no. 46544/99, § 58, ECHR 2002-I and the cases cited therein).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 30.09.2021 - C-483/20

  Nach Ansicht von Generalanwalt Pikamäe läuft es dem Unionsrecht zuwider, dass ein …

  53 Der EGMR erkennt an, dass es zwischen Geschwistern ein Familienleben geben kann, und hat klargestellt, dass eine Trennung von Geschwistern in Verfahren betreffend die Unterbringung von Kindern vermieden werden sollte, da sie dem Kindeswohl zuwiderlaufen kann (EGMR, 18. Februar 1991, Moustaquim/Belgien, CE:ECHR:1991:0218JUD001231386, § 36, sowie 6. April 2010, Mustafa und Armagan Akin/Türkei, CE:ECHR:2010:0406JUD000469403, § 19).
• EGMR - 31983/23 (anhängig)

  A.C. ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  - des contacts limitées, pendant six années, entre V. et les autres requérants (voir Moustaquim c. Belgique, no 12313/86, § 36, 18 février 1991, L. c. Finlande, no 25651/94, § 101, 27 avril 2000, Mustafa et Armagan Akin c. Turquie, no 4694/03, § 19, 6 avril 2010, Nistor c. Roumanie, no 14565/05, § 71, 2 novembre 2010, et Mitovi c. l'ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine, no 53565/13, § 59, 16 avril 2015 ; voir aussi, mutatis mutandis, Pini et autres c. Roumanie, nos 78028/01 et 78030/01, § 143, CEDH 2004 V (extraits), Kautzor c. Allemagne, no 23338/09, § 61, 22 mars 2012, et Katsikeros c. Grèce, no 2303/19, § 47, 21 juillet 2022) ?.
• EGMR, 13.11.2018 - 23183/15

  A.T. v. ESTONIA

  The Court highlights that the essential object of Article 8 is to protect the individual against arbitrary action by the public authorities (see Mustafa and Armagan Akin v. Turkey, no. 4694/03, § 20, 6 April 2010).