Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  I.H., Me.H., R.H. and Mu.H. v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6 MRK
  Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 23.10.2001 - 42780/98
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 42780/98
• EGMR, 20.04.2006 - 42780/98

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 18.01.2000 - 27618/95

  PESTI AND FRODL v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 42780/98

  27618/95 and 27619/95, ECHR 2000-I).
• EGMR, 28.08.1992 - 13161/87

  ARTNER v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 42780/98

  The Court observes that the guarantees in paragraph 3 of Article 6 are specific aspects of the right to a fair trial set forth in paragraph 1. For this reason, it considers it appropriate to examine the following complaints under the two provisions taken together (Artner v. Austria judgment of 28 August 1992, Series A no. 242-A, p. 10, § 19; Pullar v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 10 June 1996, Reports 1996-III, § 45).
• EGMR, 24.02.1993 - 14396/88

  FEY v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 42780/98

  The Court recalls that the existence of impartiality for the purpose of Article 6 § 1 must be determined according to a subjective test, that is on the basis of the personal conviction of a particular judge in a given case, and also according to an objective test, that is ascertaining whether the judge offered guarantees sufficient to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (Fey v. Austria judgment of 24 February 1993, Series A no. 255-A, p. 12, § 28; Tierce and Others v. San Marino, nos. 24954/94, 24971/94, 00024972/94, § 75, 25 July 2000).

 
• EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86

  VIDAL c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 42780/98

  The Convention does not require the attendance and examination of every witness on the accused's behalf (Bricmont v. Belgium judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, § 89; Vidal v. Belgium judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, § 33).
• EKMR, 15.07.1986 - 9938/82

  BRICMONT v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 42780/98

  The Convention does not require the attendance and examination of every witness on the accused's behalf (Bricmont v. Belgium judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, § 89; Vidal v. Belgium judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, § 33).
• EGMR, 25.07.2000 - 24954/94

  TIERCE ET AUTRES c. SAINT-MARIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 42780/98

  The Court recalls that the existence of impartiality for the purpose of Article 6 § 1 must be determined according to a subjective test, that is on the basis of the personal conviction of a particular judge in a given case, and also according to an objective test, that is ascertaining whether the judge offered guarantees sufficient to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (Fey v. Austria judgment of 24 February 1993, Series A no. 255-A, p. 12, § 28; Tierce and Others v. San Marino, nos. 24954/94, 24971/94, 00024972/94, § 75, 25 July 2000).