Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NART v. TURKEY

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-3 Violation of Art. 5-4 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 20817/04
• EGMR, 06.05.2008 - 20817/04
• EGMR, 26.09.2016 - 20817/04

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 74321/01

  KOSTI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2008 - 20817/04

  It concluded that Article 298 of the Code of Criminal Procedure could not be considered as an effective remedy and found a violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Kosti and Others v. Turkey, no. 74321/01, §§ 21-25, 3 May 2007; Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, §§ 71-72, ECHR 2005-IV).
• EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88

  W. c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2008 - 20817/04

  It is essentially on the basis of the reasons given in these decisions and of the undisputed facts stated by the applicant in his appeals that the Court is called upon to decide whether or not there has been a violation of Article 5 § 3 (see Klamecki v. Poland, no. 25415/94, § 74, 28 March 2002; W. v. Switzerland, judgment of 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254-A, pp. 15-19, §§ 30-42; Contrada v. Italy, judgment of 24 August 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-V, § 54).
• EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 16419/90

  YAGCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2008 - 20817/04

  In respect of the second objection, the Court recalls that it has already examined and rejected such an argument by the Government in similar cases (see Bayam v. Turkey, no. 26896/02, § 16, 31 July 2007; YaÄ?cı and Sargın v. Turkey, judgment of 8 June 1995, Series A no. 319-A, § 44).

• EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 66066/09

  DINÇ ET ÇAKIR c. TURQUIE

  La Cour rappelle avoir, dans plusieurs affaires contre la Turquie dans lesquelles elle a exprimé son inquiétude face à la pratique consistant à placer des mineurs en détention provisoire, conclu à la violation de l'article 5 § 3 de la Convention (Selçuk c. Turquie, no 21768/02, §§ 26-37, 10 janvier 2006, Güveç c. Turquie, no 70337/01, §§ 106-110, CEDH 2009 (extraits), et Nart c. Turquie, no 20817/04, §§ 28-35, 6 mai 2008).
• EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 10262/04

  KÖKLÜ v. TURKEY

  It concluded that Article 298 of the Code of Criminal Procedure could not be considered an effective remedy and found a violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Kosti and Others, cited above, §§ 21-25; Nart v. Turkey, no. 20817/04, § 39, 6 May 2008; Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, §§ 71-72, ECHR 2005-IV).
• EGMR, 03.02.2009 - 4661/02

  SÜKRAN YILDIZ v. TURKEY

  It concluded that Article 298 of the Code of Criminal Procedure could not be considered an effective remedy and found a violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Kosti and Others, cited above, §§ 21-25; Nart v. Turkey, no. 20817/04, § 39, 6 May 2008; Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, §§ 71-72, ECHR 2005-IV).