Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 06.05.2010 - 28780/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2010,59882
EGMR, 06.05.2010 - 28780/03 (https://dejure.org/2010,59882)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06.05.2010 - 28780/03 (https://dejure.org/2010,59882)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06. Mai 2010 - 28780/03 (https://dejure.org/2010,59882)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,59882) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9697/82

    JOHNSTON AND OTHERS v. IRELAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2010 - 28780/03
    The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see, for example, Vernillo v. France, judgment of 20 February 1991, Series A no. 198, § 27; and Johnston and Others v. Ireland, judgment of 18 December 1986, Series A no. 112, p. 22, § 45).
  • EGMR, 19.07.1995 - 17506/90

    KEROJÄRVI v. FINLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2010 - 28780/03
    However, according to the principles laid down in the Court's case-law, the legislation of the State concerned is not without importance (see Perez, cited above, §§ 57-75) and the Court must ascertain whether there was a dispute over a "right" which can be said, at least on arguable grounds, to be recognised under domestic law (see Zander v. Sweden, judgment of 25 November 1993, Series A no. 279-B, § 22, and Kerojärvi v. Finland, judgment of 19 July 1995, Series A no. 322, § 32).
  • EGMR, 25.11.1993 - 14282/88

    ZANDER v. SWEDEN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2010 - 28780/03
    However, according to the principles laid down in the Court's case-law, the legislation of the State concerned is not without importance (see Perez, cited above, §§ 57-75) and the Court must ascertain whether there was a dispute over a "right" which can be said, at least on arguable grounds, to be recognised under domestic law (see Zander v. Sweden, judgment of 25 November 1993, Series A no. 279-B, § 22, and Kerojärvi v. Finland, judgment of 19 July 1995, Series A no. 322, § 32).
  • EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

    BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2010 - 28780/03
    However, this provision applies only in respect of grievances under the Convention which are arguable (see, for example, Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, § 52).
  • EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99

    PEREZ c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.05.2010 - 28780/03
    It applies in particular to criminal proceedings involving a determination of pecuniary claims asserted by the injured parties ("civil-party complaints") and, even in the absence of such claims, to those criminal proceedings the outcome of which is decisive for the "civil right" in question (see Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, §§ 65-67 and 71, ECHR 2004-I).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht