Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.06.2000 - 33129/96 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2000,41474) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 01.07.1998 - 33129/96
- EGMR, 06.06.2000 - 33129/96
- EGMR, 04.06.2002 - 33129/96
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 22.02.1994 - 12954/87
RAIMONDO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.06.2000 - 33129/96
As to the second and third criteria, the nature of the offence and the nature and severity of the penalty imposed, the Government relied on the Court's Raimondo v. Italy judgment of 22 February 1994 (Series A no. 281-A). - EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79
Öztürk ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.06.2000 - 33129/96
They referred to the criteria developed by the Court in its case-law, particularly the Engel and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 8 June 1976 (Series A no. 22) and the Öztürk v. Germany judgment of 21 February 1984 (Series A no. 73). - EGMR, 27.11.1991 - 12565/86
OERLEMANS c. PAYS-BAS
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.06.2000 - 33129/96
They also referred to the Court's finding in its Oerlemans v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 November 1991, Series A no. 219, that "here an administrative appeal to a higher authority is not consider to offer sufficient safeguards as to a fair procedure it is possible to have recourse to the civil courts for a full review of the lawfulness of the administrative decision" (loc. cit., § 53). - EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 19589/92
BRITISH-AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY LTD c. PAYS-BAS
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.06.2000 - 33129/96
This finding had been confirmed in the Court's British-American Tobacco Company Ltd. v. the Netherlands judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 331.