Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 06.07.2006 - 13600/02 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 06.10.2005 - 13600/02
- EGMR, 06.07.2006 - 13600/02
- EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 13600/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 28.08.2001 - 50901/99
VAN DER VEN v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2006 - 13600/02
Relying on the findings of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment ("CPT") in respect of its visit to the EBI in 1997 and on the Court's decision on admissibility of 28 August 2001 in the case of Van der Ven v. the Netherlands (no. 50901/99), he argued that his (continued) detention in the EBI infringed his rights under Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention on account of the EBI detention regime.The applicant based this part of his claim on the Court's findings in its judgments of 4 February 2003 in the cases of Van der Ven v. the Netherlands (no. 50901/99, ECHR 2003-II) and Lorsé and Others v. the Netherlands (no. 52750/99), the findings of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) as set out in two reports (see paragraphs 46-47 below), a report drawn up on 10 October 2003 by academic researchers on the psychological impact of the EBI regime on the mental well-being of (former) inmates (see paragraph 23 below), and the report drawn up on 23 March 2004 by the psychiatrist R.J.P. Rijnders (see paragraph 18 above).
An overview of the relevant domestic law and practice is given in the Court's judgment of 4 February 2003 in the case of Van der Ven v. the Netherlands (no. 50901/99, §§ 26-35, ECHR 2003-II) and in Baybasın v. the Netherlands ((dec.), no. 13600/02, 6 October 2005).
- EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98
SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2006 - 13600/02
However, relying on the Court's reasoning in the cases of Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece ((Article 50), judgment of 31 October 1995, Series A no. 330-B) and Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy ([GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, ECHR 2000-VIII), the Supreme Court considered that, although the State was in principle free to determine the manner in which redress was to be provided, that freedom did not mean that the domestic judge was unable to take a decision on that point, but simply that a suitable form of redress was to be sought within the domestic legal order. - EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 11454/85
KOSTOVSKI v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2006 - 13600/02
In a judgment given on 1 February 1991 (NJ 1991, no. 413) in a civil action against the Netherlands State brought by a co-accused of a successful applicant in Strasbourg (Kostovski v. the Netherlands, judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 166), the Supreme Court held:. - EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 52750/99
LORSE AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2006 - 13600/02
The applicant based this part of his claim on the Court's findings in its judgments of 4 February 2003 in the cases of Van der Ven v. the Netherlands (no. 50901/99, ECHR 2003-II) and Lorsé and Others v. the Netherlands (no. 52750/99), the findings of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) as set out in two reports (see paragraphs 46-47 below), a report drawn up on 10 October 2003 by academic researchers on the psychological impact of the EBI regime on the mental well-being of (former) inmates (see paragraph 23 below), and the report drawn up on 23 March 2004 by the psychiatrist R.J.P. Rijnders (see paragraph 18 above). - EGMR, 27.11.1991 - 12565/86
OERLEMANS c. PAYS-BAS
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2006 - 13600/02
On the other hand, a civil action should be declared inadmissible when another specific remedy exists which offers sufficient guarantees of fair proceedings (see Supreme Court, 12 December 1986, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie (Netherlands Law Reports - "NJ") 1987, no. 381; see also Oerlemans v. the Netherlands, judgment of 27 November 1991, Series A no. 219, §§ 21-35 and §§ 53-56).