Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 38797/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,61396) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GREEN AND FARHAT v. MALTA
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 16.11.2004 - 29865/96
Diskriminierung türkischer Ehefrauen durch Verpflichtung zur Tragung des Namens …
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 38797/07
However, not every difference in treatment will amount to a violation of Article 14. It must be established that other persons in an analogous or relevantly similar situation enjoy preferential treatment and that this distinction is discriminatory (see Unal Tekeli v. Turkey, no. 29865/96, § 49, 16 November 2004). - EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 17209/02
ZARB ADAMI c. MALTE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 38797/07
The existence of such a justification must be assessed in relation to the principles which normally prevail in democratic societies (see Zarb Adami v. Malta, no. 17209/02, § 72, ECHR 2006-VIII). - EKMR, 06.01.1992 - 18643/91
BENES c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 38797/07
The Court further recalls that it is for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply domestic law (see Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 53, ECHR 2000-V), and of relevance to the instant case, it is primarily for the national legislation to lay down the rules regarding validity of marriages and to draw the legal consequences (see mutatis mutandis, Benes v. Austria, Commission decision, no. 18643/91, 6 January 1992, unreported). - EGMR, 11.06.2002 - 36042/97
WILLIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 38797/07
The Court reiterates that discrimination means treating differently, without an objective and reasonable justification, persons in relevantly similar situations (see Willis v. the United Kingdom, no. 36042/97, § 48, ECHR 2002-IV). - EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 38797/07
A fair balance has to be struck between the competing interests of the individual and of the community as a whole, and the State enjoys a certain margin of appreciation in determining the steps to be taken to ensure compliance with the Convention (see Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1990, § 41, Series A no. 172).