Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 18152/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,26935) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ERKENOV v. TURKEY
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-2 - Information on reasons for arrest);Violation of Article 5 - Right to ...
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01
Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 18152/11
The Court recalls that Article 13 requires the State to provide an effective legal remedy to deal with the substance of an "arguable complaint" under the Convention and to grant appropriate relief (see Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 98, ECHR 2006-VII).
- EGMR - 36916/19 (anhängig)
M.A. v. TÜRKIYE
Were the conditions of the applicant's detention at the Gaziantep Foreigners' Removal Centre compatible with Article 3 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Yarashonen v. Turkey, no. 72710/11, §§ 51-91, 24 June 2014; Erkenov v. Turkey, no. 18152/11, §§ 26-42, 6 September 2016; G.B. and Others v. Turkey, no. 4633/15, §§ 114-117, 17 October 2019)?. - EGMR - 48908/20 (anhängig)
F.R. v. TÜRKIYE
Were the conditions of the applicant's detention at the Erzurum, Izmir and Aydin Foreigners' Removal Centres compatible with Article 3 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Yarashonen v. Turkey, no. 72710/11, §§ 51-91, 24 June 2014; Erkenov v. Turkey, no. 18152/11, §§ 26-42, 6 September 2016; G.B. and Others v. Turkey, no. 4633/15, §§ 99-117, 17 October 2019)?.