Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  C.P. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  C.P. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 2 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 23563/07

  GAGLIANO GIORGI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 300/11

  The assessment of this minimum level is, in the nature of things, relative and depends on all the circumstances of the case (see Gagliano Giorgi v. Italy, no. 23563/07, § 55, ECHR 2012-II (extracts)).
• EGMR, 30.08.2011 - 35365/05

  LADYGIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 300/11

  Inspired by the general principle de minimis non curat praetor, this first criterion of the rule rests on the premise that a violation of a right, however real from a purely legal point of view, should attain a minimum level of severity to warrant consideration by an international court (see Ladygin v. Russia (dec.), no. 35365/05, 30 August 2011).
• EGMR, 24.10.1986 - 9118/80

  AGOSI c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 300/11

  In particular, the administrative procedure in question should afford to the persons adversely affected a reasonable opportunity of putting their case to the responsible authorities (see, mutatis mutandis, McMichael v. the United Kingdom, 24 February 1995, Series A no. 307-B, in relation to Article 8 of the Convention, and AGOSI v. the United Kingdom, 24 October 1986, Series A no. 108, in relation to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).

 
• EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 36659/04

  IONESCU c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 300/11

  The question whether the applicant has suffered any "significant disadvantage" represents the main element of the rule set forth in Article 35 § 3(b) of the Convention (see Adrian Mihai Ionescu v. Romania (dec.), no. 36659/04, 1 June 2010; see also Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no. 25551/05, ECHR 2010-V).
• EGMR, 24.02.1995 - 16424/90

  McMICHAEL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 300/11

  In particular, the administrative procedure in question should afford to the persons adversely affected a reasonable opportunity of putting their case to the responsible authorities (see, mutatis mutandis, McMichael v. the United Kingdom, 24 February 1995, Series A no. 307-B, in relation to Article 8 of the Convention, and AGOSI v. the United Kingdom, 24 October 1986, Series A no. 108, in relation to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).
• EGMR, 01.07.2010 - 25551/05

  KOROLEV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 300/11

  The question whether the applicant has suffered any "significant disadvantage" represents the main element of the rule set forth in Article 35 § 3(b) of the Convention (see Adrian Mihai Ionescu v. Romania (dec.), no. 36659/04, 1 June 2010; see also Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no. 25551/05, ECHR 2010-V).

• EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 24074/19

  CANAVCI AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE

  The subjective perception must be justified on objective grounds (see C.P. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 300/11, § 42, 6 September 2016, with further references).
• EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 52484/18

  STAVROPOULOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE

  The subjective perception must be justified on objective grounds (see, with further references, C.P. v. the United Kingdom (dec.) no. 300/11, § 42, 6 September 2016).
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 15449/09

  MARGULEV v. RUSSIA

  The subjective perception must be justified on objective grounds (see, with further references, C.P. v. the United Kingdom (dec.) no. 300/11, § 42, 6 September 2016).

 
• EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 16474/11

  NIKOLOUZOS c. GRÈCE

  Issue du principe de minimis non curat praetor, la nouvelle condition de recevabilité renvoie à l'idée que la violation d'un droit, quelle que soit sa réalité d'un point de vue strictement juridique, doit atteindre un seuil minimum de gravité pour justifier un examen par une juridiction internationale (Adrian Mihai Ionescu c. Roumanie (déc.), no 36659/04, 1er juin 2010 ; Korolev c. Russie (déc.), no 25551/05, 1er juillet 2010 ; Mura c. Pologne (déc.), no 42442/08, § 20, 2 juin 2016 et C.P. c. Royaume-Uni, no 300/11, 6 septembre 2016).
• EGMR, 23.05.2017 - 64337/14

  NEGASSI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The subjective perception must be justified on objective grounds (see, inter alia, C.P. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 300/11, § 47, 6 September 2016 and Mura v. Poland, cited above, §§ 21 and 24).
• EGMR, 29.10.2019 - 42113/09

  NOVAYA GAZETA AND BORODYANSKIY v. RUSSIA

  The subjective perception must be justified on objective grounds (see, with further references, C.P. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 300/11, § 42, 6 September 2016).