Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 28993/05   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2009,68615
EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 28993/05 (https://dejure.org/2009,68615)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06.10.2009 - 28993/05 (https://dejure.org/2009,68615)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06. Oktober 2009 - 28993/05 (https://dejure.org/2009,68615)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,68615) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

    FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 28993/05
    The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 28993/05
    The Court reiterates that the general principles regarding the right "to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial, as guaranteed by Article 5 § 3 of the Convention" have been stated in a number of its previous judgments (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110 et seq, ECHR 2000-XI, and McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, §§ 41-44, ECHR 2006-..., with further references).
  • EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03

    CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 28993/05
    The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for excessive length of judicial and enforcement proceedings, in particular the applicable provisions of the 2004 Act, are set out in the Court's decisions in the cases of Charzynski v. Poland (no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V), and Ratajczyk v. Poland (no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII), and in its judgment in the case of Krasuski v. Poland, (no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V).
  • EGMR, 27.03.2012 - 18480/06

    KURATOW c. POLOGNE

    Compte tenu de sa jurisprudence en la matière (Piotr Baranowski c. Pologne, no 39742/05, 2 octobre 2007, §§ 65-68 ; Lewicki c. Pologne, no 28993/05, 6 octobre 2009, §§ 63-67 ; Wedler, ci-dessus, § 116 ; Pyrak c. Pologne, no 54476/00, 12 février 2008, § 67), la Cour estime que les délais mis en cause par le requérant n'ont pas été excessifs.
  • EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 1629/11

    LORBIECKI v. POLAND

    The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the length of the proceedings by which a person seeks to challenge the lawfulness of his detention (see, for example, Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, ECHR 2000-III; Lewicki v. Poland, no. 28993/05, 6 October 2009; Pyrak v.Poland, no. 54476/00, 12 February 2008; Lorbiecki (dec), cited above).
  • EGMR, 09.03.2010 - 50178/08

    LORBIECKI v. POLAND

    The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the length of the proceedings by which a persons seeks to challenge the lawfulness of his detention (see, for example, Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, ECHR 2000-III; Lewicki v. Poland, no. 28993/05, 6 October 2009; Pyrak v. Poland, no. 54476/00, 12 February 2008).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht