Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 48286/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,37827) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ZUK v. POLAND
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ZUK v. POLAND
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 48286/11
- EGMR, 30.05.2017 - 48286/11
- EGMR, 05.02.2020 - 48286/11
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25644/94
T.W. v. MALTA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 48286/11
In other words, when a remedy has been pursued, use of another remedy which has essentially the same objective is not required (see T.W. v. Malta [GC], no. 25644/94, § 34, 29 April 1999; Moreira Barbosa v. Portugal (dec.), no. 65681/01, ECHR 2004-V; and Jelicic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 41183/02, 15 November 2005). - EGMR, 07.06.2005 - 71186/01
FUKLEV v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 48286/11
This means, in particular, that States are under an obligation to ensure compliance with the procedures enshrined in the legislation for the enforcement of final decisions, whether judicial or administrative, conferring rights on individuals (see Fuklev v. Ukraine, no. 71186/01, §§ 89-91, 7 June 2005, with further references). - EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 29979/04
RYSOVSKYY v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 48286/11
In so far as the Government argued that the applicant should have instituted other civil actions, the Court has repeatedly held that where an issue pertaining to the general interest is at stake, especially when it affects fundamental human rights, including property rights, the public authorities must act promptly and in an appropriate and above all consistent manner (see, among many other authorities, Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202/96, § 120, ECHR 2000-I; Öneryildiz v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 128, ECHR 2004-XII; Megadat.com S.r.l. v. Moldova, no. 21151/04, § 72, 8 April 2008; and Rysovskyy v. Ukraine, no. 29979/04, § 71, 20 October 2011).