Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 58455/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,34275) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
N.P. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
POPOVSCHI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 58455/13
- EGMR, 12.12.2018 - 58455/13
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 14.01.2003 - 27751/95
K.A. v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 58455/13
It is not enough to show that a child could be placed in a more beneficial environment for his upbringing (see K. and T. v. Finland, cited above, § 173, and K.A. v. Finland, no. 27751/95, § 92, 14 January 2003). - EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 35348/06
R. AND H. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 58455/13
Firstly, the Court must examine whether, in the light of the case as a whole, the reasons adduced to justify the measures were "relevant and sufficient"; secondly it must be examined whether the decision-making process was fair and afforded due respect to the applicant's rights under Article 8 of the Convention (see K. and T. v. Finland, cited above, § 154; R.K. and A.K. v. the United Kingdom, no. 38000/05, § 34, 30 September 2008; Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615/07, § 134, ECHR 2010; and R. and H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35348/06, §§ 75 and 81, 31 May 2011). - EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 4547/10
Y.C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 58455/13
However, where the maintenance of family ties would harm the child's health and development, a parent is not entitled under Article 8 to insist that such ties be maintained (see Neulinger and Shuruk, cited above, § 136; R. and H. v. the United Kingdom, cited above, § 73; and Y.C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 4547/10, § 134, 13 March 2012).