Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AGAPOV v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-2 - Presumption of innocence);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  AGAPOV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 12.07.2013 - 25424/09

  ALLEN c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2020 - 52464/15

  In this connection, the Court reiterates that, as expressly stated in the terms of that provision, Article 6 § 2 applies where a person is "charged with a criminal offence" within the autonomous Convention meaning (see Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25424/09, § 95, ECHR 2013).
• EGMR, 08.03.2006 - 59532/00

  BLECIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2020 - 52464/15

  Admissibility 30. The Court notes from the outset that it has to satisfy itself that it has jurisdiction in any case brought before it, and is therefore obliged to examine the question of its jurisdiction at every stage of the proceedings (see Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-III).
• EGMR, 28.06.2018 - 1828/06

  G.I.E.M. S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2020 - 52464/15

  What is also at stake once the criminal proceedings have concluded is the person's reputation and the way in which that person is perceived by the public (see Allen, cited above, §§ 93-94, and G.I.E.M. S.R.L. and Others v. Italy [GC], nos. 1828/06 and 2 others, §§ 314-15, 28 June 2018, with further references).

• EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 31634/18

  RIMSEVICS v. LATVIA

  In this connection, the Court reiterates that, as expressly stated in the terms of that provision, Article 6 § 2 applies where a person is "charged with a criminal offence" within the autonomous Convention meaning (see Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25424/09, § 95, ECHR 2013, and Agapov v. Russia, no. 52464/15, § 31, 6 October 2020), that is, as of the moment that an individual is officially notified by the competent authority of an allegation that he has committed a criminal offence (see Bikas v. Germany, no. 76607/13, § 30, 25 January 2018, and the authorities cited therein), or from the point at which his situation has been substantially affected by actions taken by the authorities as a result of a suspicion against him (see McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 143, 10 September 2010; Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980/04, §§ 110-11, 12 May 2017; and Larrañaga Arando and Others v. Spain (dec.), no. 73911/16 and 3 others, § 40, 25 June 2019, and the authorities cited therein).