Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 06.11.2006 - 44574/98, 45133/98, 48316/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2006,37139
EGMR, 06.11.2006 - 44574/98, 45133/98, 48316/99 (https://dejure.org/2006,37139)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06.11.2006 - 44574/98, 45133/98, 48316/99 (https://dejure.org/2006,37139)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06. November 2006 - 44574/98, 45133/98, 48316/99 (https://dejure.org/2006,37139)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,37139) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 34884/97

    BOTTAZZI c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2006 - 44574/98
    The Court reiterates that an award can be made to an applicant in respect of costs and expenses only in so far as they have been actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, § 30, ECHR 1999-V).
  • EGMR, 14.02.2002 - 48470/99

    JENSEN v. DENMARK

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2006 - 44574/98
    However, relying on Eckle v. Germany (judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 32, §§ 69 et seq.), Jensen v. Denmark ((dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X) and Kljajic v. Croatia (no. 22681/02, § 23, 17 March 2005), they stressed that "an applicant's status as a victim may depend on compensation being awarded at domestic level on the basis of the facts about which he or she complains before the Court and on whether the domestic authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, the breach of the Convention".
  • EGMR, 17.03.2005 - 22681/02

    KLJAJIC v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2006 - 44574/98
    However, relying on Eckle v. Germany (judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 32, §§ 69 et seq.), Jensen v. Denmark ((dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X) and Kljajic v. Croatia (no. 22681/02, § 23, 17 March 2005), they stressed that "an applicant's status as a victim may depend on compensation being awarded at domestic level on the basis of the facts about which he or she complains before the Court and on whether the domestic authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, the breach of the Convention".
  • EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

    Eckle ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2006 - 44574/98
    However, relying on Eckle v. Germany (judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 32, §§ 69 et seq.), Jensen v. Denmark ((dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X) and Kljajic v. Croatia (no. 22681/02, § 23, 17 March 2005), they stressed that "an applicant's status as a victim may depend on compensation being awarded at domestic level on the basis of the facts about which he or she complains before the Court and on whether the domestic authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, the breach of the Convention".
  • EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

    DEWEER c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2006 - 44574/98
    In various cases in which an applicant has died in the course of the proceedings the Court has taken into account the statements of the applicant's heirs or of close members of his family who have expressed the wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see, for example, Deweer v. Belgium, judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, pp. 19-20, §§ 37-38, Vocaturo v. Italy, judgment of 24 May 1991, Series A no. 206-C, p. 29, § 2, and Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht