Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SOBOTA-GAJIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  Art. 8 MRK
  Violation of Art. 8 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 22.06.1989 - 11373/85

  ERIKSSON c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2007 - 27966/06

  In this context, the Court has repeatedly held that Article 8 includes a right for parents to have measures taken that will permit them to be reunited with their children and an obligation on the national authorities to take such action (see Eriksson v. Sweden, judgment of 22 June 1989, Series A no. 156, pp. 26-27, § 71, Margareta and Roger Andersson v. Sweden, judgment of 25 February 1992, Series A no. 226-A, p. 30, § 91, Olsson v. Sweden (no. 2), judgment of 27 November 1992, Series A no. 250, pp.
• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92

  HOKKANEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2007 - 27966/06

  35-36, § 90, Hokkanen v. Finland, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A, p. 20, § 55, Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, judgment of 25 January 2000, Reports 2000-I, p. 265, § 94, Nuutinen v. Finland, judgment of 27 June 2000, Reports 2000-VIII, p. 83, § 127, and Sylvester v. Austria, nos.
• EGMR, 27.11.1992 - 13441/87

  OLSSON c. SUÈDE (N° 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2007 - 27966/06

  In this context, the Court has repeatedly held that Article 8 includes a right for parents to have measures taken that will permit them to be reunited with their children and an obligation on the national authorities to take such action (see Eriksson v. Sweden, judgment of 22 June 1989, Series A no. 156, pp. 26-27, § 71, Margareta and Roger Andersson v. Sweden, judgment of 25 February 1992, Series A no. 226-A, p. 30, § 91, Olsson v. Sweden (no. 2), judgment of 27 November 1992, Series A no. 250, pp.
• EGMR, 25.02.1992 - 12963/87

  MARGARETA AND ROGER ANDERSSON v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2007 - 27966/06

  In this context, the Court has repeatedly held that Article 8 includes a right for parents to have measures taken that will permit them to be reunited with their children and an obligation on the national authorities to take such action (see Eriksson v. Sweden, judgment of 22 June 1989, Series A no. 156, pp. 26-27, § 71, Margareta and Roger Andersson v. Sweden, judgment of 25 February 1992, Series A no. 226-A, p. 30, § 91, Olsson v. Sweden (no. 2), judgment of 27 November 1992, Series A no. 250, pp.
• EGMR, 26.05.1994 - 16969/90

  KEEGAN v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2007 - 27966/06

  There are in addition positive obligations inherent in an effective "respect" for family life (see Keegan v. Ireland, judgment of 26 May 1994, Series A no. 290, p. 19, § 49).

• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 56065/10

  MILOVANOVIC v. SERBIA

  The Court will therefore adopt a global approach when considering the domestic proceedings and have regard to the overall facts which may be important for the context and merits of the main proceedings (see, mutatis mutandis, in the context of Article 6 and ratione materiae compatibility, Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056/06, §§ 77, ECHR 2009 and, in the context of Article 10, Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148/00, § 22, ECHR 2004-IV; see, in the child custody context, ? obota-Gajic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 27966/06, § 45, 6 November 2007, and Oller Kami??ska v. Poland, cited above, § 74, where the Court adopted a global approach to the examination of the entire civil proceedings, the interim orders included, although, if examined separately, the interim orders would have been rejected for non-compliance with the six-month rule).
• EGMR, 27.05.2008 - 22893/05

  RODIC ET AUTRES c. BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE

  Compte tenu des barèmes fixés par les barreaux locaux, que la Cour estime raisonnables dans les circonstances de l'espèce, le représentant des requérants est fondé à demander environ 8 000 EUR au total, étant donné qu'il a soumis la requête initiale dans l'une des langues officielles de Bosnie-Herzégovine et communiqué, à la demande de la Cour, cinq mémoires en anglais (voir, mutatis mutandis, Sobota-Gajic c. Bosnie-Herzégovine, no 27966/06, § 70, 6 novembre 2007).
• EGMR, 02.03.2021 - 59181/18

  DELIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  In the present case, regard being had to the documents in its possession and the above criteria, the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums claimed, totalling EUR 1, 346, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant (see, by analogy, Sobota-Gajic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 27966/06, § 70, 6 November 2007).
• EGMR, 12.06.2008 - 71127/01

  BEVACQUA AND S. v. BULGARIA

  The right to respect for one's family life under Article 8 includes a parent's right to the taking of measures with a view to his or her being reunited with his or her child and an obligation - albeit not absolute - on the national authorities to take such action (see, as a recent authority, Sobota-Gajic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 27966/06, § 51, 6 November 2007, with further references).