Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 49492/06   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2008,38553
EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 49492/06 (https://dejure.org/2008,38553)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06.11.2008 - 49492/06 (https://dejure.org/2008,38553)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06. November 2008 - 49492/06 (https://dejure.org/2008,38553)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,38553) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (23)

  • EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 34884/97

    BOTTAZZI c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 49492/06
    Moreover, in circumstances that were admittedly different from those of the present case, the Court has laid down the principle that it is for the Contracting States to organise their services and train their personnel in such a way that they can meet the requirements of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Hadri-Vionnet, cited above, §§ 54-57; Dammann v. Switzerland, no. 77551/01, § 55, 25 April 2006; Scordino (no. 1) [GC], cited above, § 183; and Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, § 22, ECHR 1999-V).

    However, an award can be made in respect of costs and expenses only in so far as they have been actually and necessarily incurred by the applicant and are reasonable as to quantum (see Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, § 30, ECHR 1999-V, and Linnekogel v. Switzerland, no. 43874/98, § 49, 1 March 2005).

  • EGMR, 13.07.1983 - 8737/79

    Zimmermann und Steiner ./. Schweiz

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 49492/06
    114 The Court reiterates that, where it finds that there has been a violation of the Convention, it may award the applicant not only the costs and expenses incurred before the Strasbourg institutions, but also those incurred before the national courts for the prevention or redress of the violation (see, in particular, Zimmermann and Steiner v. Switzerland, 13 July 1983, § 36, Series A no. 66).
  • EGMR, 27.11.1992 - 13441/87

    OLSSON c. SUÈDE (N° 2)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 49492/06
    In the present case, the Court observes that, for the reimbursement of costs and expenses, it is necessary to bear in mind that only one complaint has been declared admissible (see, mutatis mutandis, Olsson v. Sweden (no. 2), 27 November 1992, § 113, Series A no. 250, and Linnekogel, cited above, § 50).
  • EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 43874/98

    LINNEKOGEL c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 49492/06
    However, an award can be made in respect of costs and expenses only in so far as they have been actually and necessarily incurred by the applicant and are reasonable as to quantum (see Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, § 30, ECHR 1999-V, and Linnekogel v. Switzerland, no. 43874/98, § 49, 1 March 2005).
  • EGMR, 27.04.2000 - 47457/99

    Bestimmung des Aufenthaltsorts gemeinsamer Kinder nach Trennung der Eltern; Eine

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 49492/06
    47457/99 and 47458/99, ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 22.06.2006 - 7548/04

    BIANCHI c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 49492/06
    The Court has had occasion to set out and develop guidelines to be followed in child abduction situations where it has to ascertain whether the authorities of a State party to the Convention have fulfilled their obligations under Article 8 of the Convention (see, in particular, Maumousseau and Washington v. France, no. 39388/05, §§ 58-83, ECHR 2007-XIII; Bianchi v. Switzerland, no. 7548/04, §§ 76-85, 22 June 2006; Monory v. Romania and Hungary, no. 71099/01, §§ 69-85, 5 April 2005; Eskinazi and Chelouche v. Turkey (dec.), no. 14600/05, ECHR 2005-XIII; Karadzic v. Croatia, no. 35030/04, §§ 51-54, 15 December 2005; Iglesias Gil and A.U.I. v. Spain, no. 56673/00, §§ 48-52, ECHR 2003-V; Sylvester v. Austria, nos.
  • EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74

    ARTICO c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 49492/06
    (viii) The Court further reiterates the well-established principle of its case-law that the Convention is intended to guarantee not rights that are theoretical or illusory but rights that are practical and effective (see Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 33, Series A no. 37).
  • EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73

    WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 49492/06
    The Court would also point out that it is in the first place for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply the domestic law (see Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 46, Series A no. 33), of which the international treaties incorporated therein form a part.
  • EGMR, 15.05.2003 - 4783/03

    PARADIS and OTHERS v. GERMANY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 49492/06
    36812/97 and 40104/98, §§ 55-60, 24 April 2003; Paradis v. Germany, (dec.), no. 4783/03, 15 May 2003; Guichard v. France (dec.), no. 56838/00, ECHR 2003-X; Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, §§ 94-96, ECHR 2000-I; and Tiemann v. France and Germany (dec.), nos.
  • EGMR, 02.09.2003 - 56838/00

    GUICHARD contre la FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 49492/06
    36812/97 and 40104/98, §§ 55-60, 24 April 2003; Paradis v. Germany, (dec.), no. 4783/03, 15 May 2003; Guichard v. France (dec.), no. 56838/00, ECHR 2003-X; Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, §§ 94-96, ECHR 2000-I; and Tiemann v. France and Germany (dec.), nos.
  • EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

    Eckle ./. Deutschland

  • EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

    RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  • EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 28114/95

    DALBAN v. ROMANIA

  • EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96

    GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN

  • EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

    AVSAR c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 05.04.2005 - 71099/01

    MONORY v. ROMANIA AND HUNGARY

  • EGMR, 06.12.2005 - 14600/05

    ESKINAZI ET CHELOUCHE c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 15.12.2005 - 35030/04

    KARADZIC v. CROATIA

  • EGMR, 25.04.2006 - 77551/01

    DAMMANN c. SUISSE

  • EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 39388/05

    Maumousseau und Washington ./. Frankreich

  • EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 56673/00

    IGLESIAS GIL ET A.U.I. c. ESPAGNE

  • EGMR, 26.06.2003 - 48206/99

    MAIRE v. PORTUGAL

  • EGMR, 24.04.2003 - 36812/97

    SYLVESTER v. AUSTRIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht