Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 75522/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,68882) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MIKHANIV v. UKRAINE
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 5-1 Violation of Art. 5-3 Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 75522/01
- EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 75522/01
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93
NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 75522/01
The Court reiterates that in order for costs and expenses to be included in an award under Article 41, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred in order to prevent or obtain redress for the matter found to constitute a violation of the Convention and were reasonable as to quantum (see Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-VIII). - EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 28358/95
BARANOWSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 75522/01
It is therefore essential that the conditions for deprivation of liberty under domestic law be clearly defined and that the law itself be foreseeable in its application, so that it meets the standard of "lawfulness" set by the Convention, a standard which requires that all law be sufficiently precise to allow the person - if need be, with appropriate advice - to foresee, to a degree that is reasonable in the circumstances, the consequences which a given action may entail (see Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-52, ECHR 2000-III). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 75522/01
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 75522/01
Thus, according to this provision, a State becomes responsible for the welfare of persons in detention, and the authorities have a duty to afford such persons the required protection (see, among other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI, and Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, cited above, § 81). - EGMR, 05.04.2005 - 54825/00
NEVMERZHITSKY v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 75522/01
The relevant domestic law is summarised in the judgment of Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine (no. 54825/00, §§ 53-56, ECHR 2005-II).