Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 23185/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2012,55516
EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 23185/03 (https://dejure.org/2012,55516)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06.11.2012 - 23185/03 (https://dejure.org/2012,55516)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06. November 2012 - 23185/03 (https://dejure.org/2012,55516)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55516) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MAKSIM PETROV v. RUSSIA

    Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2 MRK
    Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-2 - Presumption of innocence) ...

Sonstiges (2)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

  • EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 62208/00

    LABZOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 23185/03
    The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of a lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, §§ 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, §§ 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, §§ 39 et seq., 20 January 2005; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 69 et seq., ECHR 2001-III).
  • EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

    PEERS v. GREECE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 23185/03
    The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of a lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, §§ 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, §§ 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, §§ 39 et seq., 20 January 2005; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 69 et seq., ECHR 2001-III).
  • EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

    TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 23185/03
    A failure on the Government's part to submit such information without a satisfactory explanation may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of these allegations (see Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, §§ 66 and 70, ECHR 2000-VI).
  • EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79

    Minelli ./. Schweiz

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 23185/03
    It prohibits the premature expression by the tribunal itself of the opinion that the person "charged with a criminal offence" is guilty before he has been so proved according to law (see Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, § 37, Series A no. 62) but it also covers statements made by other public officials, including police officers or prosecutors, about pending criminal investigations which could encourage the public to believe the suspect to be guilty and to prejudge the assessment of the facts by the relevant judicial authority (see Allenet de Ribemont, cited above, § 41; Daktaras v. Lithuania, no. 42095/98, §§ 41-43, ECHR 2000-X; Butkevicius v. Lithuania, no. 48297/99, § 49, ECHR 2002-II; Y.B. and Others v. Turkey, nos. 48173/99 and 48319/99, §§ 46-51, 28 October 2004 and Samoila and Cionca v. Romania, no. 33065/03, §§ 91-101, 4 March 2008).
  • EGMR, 20.01.2005 - 63378/00

    MAYZIT v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 23185/03
    The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of a lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, §§ 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, §§ 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, §§ 39 et seq., 20 January 2005; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 69 et seq., ECHR 2001-III).
  • EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89

    ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 23185/03
    The presumption of innocence enshrined in paragraph 2 of Article 6 is one of the elements of the fair criminal trial that is required by paragraph 1 of that Convention (see Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, § 35, Series A no. 308).
  • EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

    KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 23185/03
    The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of a lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, §§ 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, §§ 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, §§ 39 et seq., 20 January 2005; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 69 et seq., ECHR 2001-III).
  • EGMR, 02.06.2005 - 66460/01

    NOVOSELOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 23185/03
    The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of a lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, §§ 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, §§ 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, §§ 39 et seq., 20 January 2005; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 69 et seq., ECHR 2001-III).
  • EGMR, 10.10.2000 - 42095/98

    DAKTARAS c. LITUANIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 23185/03
    It prohibits the premature expression by the tribunal itself of the opinion that the person "charged with a criminal offence" is guilty before he has been so proved according to law (see Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, § 37, Series A no. 62) but it also covers statements made by other public officials, including police officers or prosecutors, about pending criminal investigations which could encourage the public to believe the suspect to be guilty and to prejudge the assessment of the facts by the relevant judicial authority (see Allenet de Ribemont, cited above, § 41; Daktaras v. Lithuania, no. 42095/98, §§ 41-43, ECHR 2000-X; Butkevicius v. Lithuania, no. 48297/99, § 49, ECHR 2002-II; Y.B. and Others v. Turkey, nos. 48173/99 and 48319/99, §§ 46-51, 28 October 2004 and Samoila and Cionca v. Romania, no. 33065/03, §§ 91-101, 4 March 2008).
  • EGMR, 28.10.2004 - 48173/99

    Y.B. ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 23185/03
    It prohibits the premature expression by the tribunal itself of the opinion that the person "charged with a criminal offence" is guilty before he has been so proved according to law (see Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, § 37, Series A no. 62) but it also covers statements made by other public officials, including police officers or prosecutors, about pending criminal investigations which could encourage the public to believe the suspect to be guilty and to prejudge the assessment of the facts by the relevant judicial authority (see Allenet de Ribemont, cited above, § 41; Daktaras v. Lithuania, no. 42095/98, §§ 41-43, ECHR 2000-X; Butkevicius v. Lithuania, no. 48297/99, § 49, ECHR 2002-II; Y.B. and Others v. Turkey, nos. 48173/99 and 48319/99, §§ 46-51, 28 October 2004 and Samoila and Cionca v. Romania, no. 33065/03, §§ 91-101, 4 March 2008).
  • EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99

    Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention,

  • EGMR, 09.07.2019 - 40834/11

    KALINICHENKO c. RUSSIE

    La Cour estime que l'utilisation sans nuance ni réserve de ces qualificatifs au sujet du requérant était de nature à inciter le public à croire à la culpabilité de celui-ci et qu'elle préjugeait de l'appréciation des faits par les juges compétents, et ce au mépris du principe de la présomption d'innocence (Ürfi Çetinkaya c. Turquie, no 19866/04, §§ 132-151, 23 juillet 2013, et Maksim Petrov c. Russie, no 23185/03, §§ 102-107, 6 novembre 2012).
  • EGMR, 12.11.2019 - 60677/10

    KOROBOV c. RUSSIE

    Eu égard à ces éléments, la Cour estime que, par ses articles des 12 et 19 octobre 2005, K. a informé le public de l'enquête pénale dont il avait la charge, et qu'il l'a fait avec la discrétion et la réserve voulues en respectant la présomption d'innocence à l'égard du requérant (voir, a contrario, Maksim Petrov c. Russie, no 23185/03, §§ 104-107, 6 novembre 2012).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht