Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 49635/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55512) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TOTH v. CROATIA
Art. 6, Art. 13, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 4 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79
Öztürk ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 49635/10
In addition, it is the Court's established jurisprudence that the second and third criteria laid down in Engel are alternative and not necessarily cumulative: for Article 6 to be held applicable, it suffices that the offence in question is by its nature to be regarded as "criminal" from the point of view of the Convention, or that the offence made the person liable to a sanction which, by its nature and degree of severity, belongs in general to the "criminal" sphere (see Öztürk v. Germany, 21 February 1984, Series A no. 73, § 54, and Lutz v. Germany, 25 August 1987, Series A no. 123, § 55). - EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 12547/86
BENDENOUN c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 49635/10
This does not exclude that a cumulative approach may be adopted where separate analysis of each criterion does not make it possible to reach a clear conclusion as to the existence of a criminal charge (see Bendenoun v. France, 24 February 1994, Series A no. 284, § 47; Benham v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, § 56; Garyfallou AEBE v. Greece, 24 September 1997, Reports 1997-V, § 33; and Lauko v. Slovakia, 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, § 57). - EGMR, 28.06.1984 - 7819/77
CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 49635/10
The Court has already held that the "Engel" criteria apply in the prison context in connection with the disciplinary punishment of prisoners (see Campbell and Fell, v. the United Kingdom, 28 June 1984, §§ 68-69, Series A no. 80, and Ezeh and Connors, cited above, §§ 83-85). - EGMR, 10.02.2009 - 14939/03
Sergeï Zolotoukhine ./. Russland
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 49635/10
The notion of "penal procedure" in the text of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 must also be interpreted in the light of the general principles concerning the corresponding words "criminal charge" and "penalty" in Articles 6 and 7 of the Convention respectively (see Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939/03, § 52, ECHR 2009).