Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 67604/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55505) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
OSMANOVIC v. CROATIA
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4 MRK
No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review by a court) ...
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Osmanovic v. Croatia
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 46133/99
SMIRNOVA c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 67604/10
The arguments for and against release must not be "general and abstract" (see Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 63, ECHR 2003-IX). - EGMR, 13.03.2007 - 23393/05
CASTRAVET v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 67604/10
The Court reiterates that Article 5 of the Convention is, together with Articles 2, 3 and 4, in the first rank of the fundamental rights that protect the physical security of an individual, and as such its importance is paramount (see Castravet v. Moldova, no. 23393/05, § 29, 13 March 2007). - EGMR, 22.02.1989 - 11152/84
CIULLA v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 67604/10
In this respect the Court would also reiterate that breach of the peace must be regarded as an "offence" within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention (see Steel and Others v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, § 49, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VII) and that sub-paragraph (c) of Article 5 § 1 must be read in conjunction both with sub-paragraph (a) and with paragraph 3, which forms a whole with it (see Ciulla v. Italy, 22 February 1989, § 38, Series A no. 148).
- EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 16419/90
YAGCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 67604/10
A person charged with an offence must always be released pending trial unless the State can show that there are "relevant and sufficient" reasons to justify the continued detention (see YaÄ?cı and Sargın v. Turkey, 8 June 1995, § 52, Series A no. 319-A). - EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 13616/88
HENTRICH v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 67604/10
The purpose of Article 35 is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, for example, Hentrich v. France, 22 September 1994, § 33, Series A no. 296-A, and Remli v. France, 23 April 1996, § 33, Reports 1996-II). - EGMR, 28.03.1990 - 11968/86
B. ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 67604/10
In such cases, the Court must establish whether the other grounds given by the judicial authorities continued to justify the deprivation of liberty (see Contrada v. Italy, 24 August 1998, § 54, Reports 1998-V; I.A. v. France, 23 September 1998, § 102, Reports 1998-VII; Toth v. Austria, 12 December 1991, § 67, Series A no. 224; and B. v. Austria, 28 March 1990, § 42, Series A no. 175).