Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.11.2014 - 6687/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,33010) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
FAGANEL v. SLOVENIA
Art. 3, Art. 13 MRK
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Faganel v. Slovenia
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 07.06.2011 - 30221/06
SZEL v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2014 - 6687/10
Having regard to the cumulative effects of the aforementioned conditions of the applicant's detention, the Court considers that the hardship he endured exceeded the unavoidable level inherent in detention, and finds that the resulting suffering went beyond the threshold of severity under Article 3 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Szél v. Hungary, no. 30221/06, § 18, 7 June 2011, and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 75, ECHR 2001-III). - EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 5903/10
STRUCL AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2014 - 6687/10
In the present case, regard being had to the information in its possession and in particular the fact that the law firm representing the applicant has already been reimbursed in other cases for preparation of submissions almost identical to the present one (see Mandic and Jovic, cited above, §§ 133-35, Strucl and Others v. Slovenia, nos. 5903/10, 6003/10 and 6544/10, §§ 146-48, 20 October 2011 and Praznik v. Slovenia, no. 6234/10, §§ 38-40, 28 June 2012), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum of EUR 500 to cover the costs of the proceedings before the Court. - EGMR, 28.06.2012 - 6234/10
PRAZNIK v. SLOVENIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2014 - 6687/10
In the present case, regard being had to the information in its possession and in particular the fact that the law firm representing the applicant has already been reimbursed in other cases for preparation of submissions almost identical to the present one (see Mandic and Jovic, cited above, §§ 133-35, Strucl and Others v. Slovenia, nos. 5903/10, 6003/10 and 6544/10, §§ 146-48, 20 October 2011 and Praznik v. Slovenia, no. 6234/10, §§ 38-40, 28 June 2012), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum of EUR 500 to cover the costs of the proceedings before the Court. - EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23536/94
Strafrechtliche Verfolgung auf Grund der Veröffentlichung eines Buches mit …
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2014 - 6687/10
With regard to an applicant's Convention costs, the Court reiterates that it does not consider itself bound by domestic scales and practices, although it may derive some assistance from them (see, among many other authorities, Gaspari v. Slovenia, no. 21055/03, § 83, 21 July 2009, and Baskaya and OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 98, ECHR 1999-IV).