Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 18877/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,53014) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ORLOWSKI v. POLAND
Partly struck out of the list;Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ORLOWSKI v. POLAND
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EKMR, 24.01.1968 - 3321/67
GOVERNMENT OF DENMARK v. THE GOVERNMENT OF GREECE ; GOVERNMENT OF NORWAY v. THE …
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 18877/12
3321/67, 3322/67, 3323/67 and 3344/67, Commission's report of 5 November 1969, Yearbook 12, p. 186, and Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 110, ECHR 2001-III). - EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98
VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 18877/12
Moreover, in the light of the above considerations, and in particular given the clear and extensive case-law on the topic (see, mutatis mutandis, Belevitskiy v. Russia, no. 72967/01, §§ 73-79, 1 March 2007; Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 104, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 63, 106-107, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)), the Court is satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine). - EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 18877/12
Moreover, in the light of the above considerations, and in particular given the clear and extensive case-law on the topic (see, mutatis mutandis, Belevitskiy v. Russia, no. 72967/01, §§ 73-79, 1 March 2007; Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 104, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 63, 106-107, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)), the Court is satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine). - EGMR, 01.03.2007 - 72967/01
BELEVITSKIY v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 18877/12
Moreover, in the light of the above considerations, and in particular given the clear and extensive case-law on the topic (see, mutatis mutandis, Belevitskiy v. Russia, no. 72967/01, §§ 73-79, 1 March 2007; Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 104, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 63, 106-107, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)), the Court is satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine). - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 18877/12
To this end, the Court has examined the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objections) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Sp. z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwi??ska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007).