Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 27821/16 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,36018) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MILICEVIC v. MONTENEGRO
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
MILICEVIC v. MONTENEGRO
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 27821/16
- EGMR, 04.09.2019 - 27821/16
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 38478/05
SANDRA JANKOVIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 27821/16
The Court considers that the complaint in the present case falls to be examined under Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Sandra Jankovic v. Croatia, no. 38478/05, § 27, 5 March 2009, and A. v. Croatia, no. 55164/08, § 57, 14 October 2010), which reads as follows:.4149/04 and 41029/04, § 59, ECHR 2012, and Sandra Jankovic v. Croatia, no. 38478/05, §§ 44-45, 5 March 2009.
- EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99
MIKULIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 27821/16
While the essential object of Article 8 is to protect the individual against arbitrary interference by the public authorities, there may in addition be positive obligations inherent in effective respect for private life, which may involve the adoption of measures in the sphere of relations between individuals (see Barbulescu v. Romania [GC], no. 61496/08, § 115, 5 September 2017 (extracts); Tavli v. Turkey, no. 11449/02, § 28, 9 November 2006; and Mikulic v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, § 57, ECHR 2002-I). - EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10
RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 27821/16
By virtue of the jura novit curia principle the Court is not bound by the legal grounds adduced by the applicant under the Convention and the Protocols thereto and has the power to decide on the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of a complaint by examining it under Articles or provisions of the Convention that are different from those relied upon by the applicant (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 126, ECHR 2018). - EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11
DENISOV v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 27821/16
The Court has previously held, in various contexts, that the concept of private life within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention includes a person's physical and psychological integrity (see, for example, Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, § 95, 25 September 2018, and Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, § 50, ECHR 2004-VI).