Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 34934/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,53021) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
RAKOWSKI v. POLAND
Partly struck out of the list;Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 34934/14
Only when those two conditions are satisfied does the subsidiary nature of the protective mechanism of the Convention preclude examination of an application by the Court (see Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 32, §§ 69 et seq., and Jensen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X). - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 34934/14
To this end, the Court has examined the declarations in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objections) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Sp. z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwi??ska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007).
- EGMR, 01.12.2022 - 73247/14
M.H. v. POLAND
The general principles applicable in cases concerning complaints of length of proceedings are set out in the Court's well-established case-law, namely Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) ([GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-81 and § 193, ECHR 2006-V), Norman v. Denmark ((dec.), no. 44704/98, 14 June 2001) and Rakowski v. Poland ((dec.), no. 34934/14, § 11, 6 November 2018).