Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 21978/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,52371) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
JANKAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA
Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly struck out of the list Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 07.04.2005 - 53254/99
KARALEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 21978/07
Taking into account that the parties have failed to reach a friendly settlement in the present case, and having regard to the particular facts of the case as well as to the case-law of the Court in similar cases, in particular Karalevicius v. Lithuania (7 April 2005, no. 53254/99)... and Savenkovas v. Lithuania (18 November 2008, no. 871/02), the Government declare that they are prepared to pay to the applicant a compensation in the amount of EUR 5, 000 (five thousand euros), this amount being the global sum and covering any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage together with any costs and expenses incurred, with a view to terminate the proceedings pending before the Court in the case of Jankauskas v. Lithuania (application no. 21978/07).The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Lithuania, its practice concerning complaints about the conditions of detention (see, for example, Karalevicius v. Lithuania, no. 53254/99, §§ 29-41, 7 April 2005) and censorship of the applicants" correspondence with the Court (ibid., §§ 56-61; and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, §§ 126-130, ECHR 2001-VIII).
- EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98
VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 21978/07
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Lithuania, its practice concerning complaints about the conditions of detention (see, for example, Karalevicius v. Lithuania, no. 53254/99, §§ 29-41, 7 April 2005) and censorship of the applicants" correspondence with the Court (ibid., §§ 56-61; and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, §§ 126-130, ECHR 2001-VIII). - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 21978/07
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI); WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03).