Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 35089/09 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
WYSOCZANSKI v. POLAND
Art. 3, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 52070/08
LATAK v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 35089/09
More recent developments are described in the Court's decision in the case of Latak v. Poland (no. 52070/08) on 12 October 2010 (see §§ 25-54).The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 3 on account of overcrowding and inadequate detention conditions (see, for example, the pilot judgments in the cases of Orchowski v. Poland, no. 17885/04, ECHR 2009-... (extracts) and Norbert Sikorski v. Poland, no. 17599/05, 22 October 2009 and the leading follow-up decision in the case of Latak v. Poland (dec.), no. 52070/08, 12 October 2010).
- EGMR, 21.09.2016 - 17885/04
ORCHOWSKI AND 6 OTHER CASES AGAINST POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 35089/09
A detailed description of the relevant domestic law and practice concerning general rules governing the conditions of detention in Poland and domestic remedies available to detainees alleging that conditions of their detention were inadequate are set out in the Court's pilot judgments given in the cases of Orchowski v. Poland (no. 17885/04) and Norbert Sikorski v. Poland (no. 17599/05) on 22 October 2009 (see §§ 75-85 and §§ 45-88 respectively).The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 3 on account of overcrowding and inadequate detention conditions (see, for example, the pilot judgments in the cases of Orchowski v. Poland, no. 17885/04, ECHR 2009-... (extracts) and Norbert Sikorski v. Poland, no. 17599/05, 22 October 2009 and the leading follow-up decision in the case of Latak v. Poland (dec.), no. 52070/08, 12 October 2010).
- EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 35089/09
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI); WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03).