Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PESUKIC v. SWITZERLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
  No violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [FRE]

Wird zitiert von ... (11)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 11454/85

  KOSTOVSKI v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2012 - 25088/07

  The defence was thus prevented from observing X's demeanour under direct questioning, and thus from testing his reliability (see Van Mechelen and Others, cited above, § 59 and Kostovski v. the Netherlands, 20 November 1989, § 42, Series A no. 166).
• EGMR, 26.09.2012 - 926/05

  TAXQUET CONTRE LA BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2012 - 25088/07

  In addition, the Court's primary concern under Article 6 § 1 is to evaluate the overall fairness of the criminal proceedings (see Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926/05, § 84, 16 November 2010, with further references therein).

• EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 9154/10

  Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Zeugen (Al-Khawaja-Test; Recht auf ein …

  In dieser Hinsicht kann dieser Fall von der Rechtssache Pesukic./. Schweiz (Nr. 25088/07, 6. Dezember 2012) unterschieden werden, in der es um die Offenlegung der Identität des Zeugen ging.
• EGMR, 06.02.2024 - 56440/15

  SNIJDERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  In view of this, the Court must be satisfied that there are sufficient counterbalancing factors, including the existence of strong procedural safeguards, to permit a fair and proper assessment of the reliability of that evidence to take place (see Süleyman, cited above, §§ 63-66; Al-Khawaja and Tahery, cited above, § 147; and Pesukic v. Switzerland, no. 25088/07, § 45, 6 December 2012).

  Furthermore, the trial court had access only to the redacted record of the questioning, which omitted the witness's answers to several questions that might have been important in assessing his or her credibility and/or having the fullest possible view of the case (compare Pesukic v. Switzerland, no. 25088/07, § 50, 6 March 2013, where the identity of the anonymous witness was known to the presiding judge, the witness was questioned before the entire court, and disclosures were made about the witness's criminal record and other aspects).

  And the present judgment (see paragraph 67) concludes on this point, by making it clear that, as in cases where the statement of an absent witness was considered the sole or decisive evidence or where such evidence carried significant weight, the Court must subject the proceedings in which a statement of anonymous witness is used in evidence to the most searching scrutiny, adding that, in view of this, it must be satisfied that there are sufficient counterbalancing factors, including the existence of strong procedural safeguards, to permit a fair and proper assessment of the reliability of that evidence to take place (see Süleyman, cited above, §§ 63-66; Al-Khawaja and Tahery, cited above, § 147; and Pesukic v. Switzerland, no. 25088/07, § 45, 6 December 2012).

  In view of this, the Court must be satisfied that there are sufficient counterbalancing factors, including the existence of strong procedural safeguards, to permit a fair and proper assessment of the reliability of that evidence to take place (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery, cited above, § 147, and Pesukic v. Switzerland, no. 25088/07, § 45, 6 December 2012).

• EGMR, 17.04.2014 - 9154/10

  Verletzung des Grundsatzes des fairen Verfahrens und der Waffengleichheit bzgl. …

  April 2012), um die Zulassung der - als "von erheblichem Gewicht" bewerteten - Aussage eines anonymen Zeugen ( Pesukic ./. Schweiz , Individualbeschwerde Nr. 25088/07, Rdnr. 49, 6. Dezember 2012) und um die Zulassung der - weder als alleiniges noch als entscheidendes Beweismittel bewerteten - Aussage eines abwesenden Zeugen ging (… Stefancic ./. Slowenien , Individualbeschwerde Nr. 18027/05, Rdnr. 42, 25. Oktober 2012).

 
• EGMR, 20.07.2021 - 19699/18

  AKGÜN c. TURQUIE

  À cet égard, je souhaite renvoyer, par analogie, à la jurisprudence constante de la Cour sur les informateurs anonymes ou les « repentis ", en vertu de laquelle la Convention n'empêche pas de s'appuyer, au cours de la phase initiale de la procédure pénale, sur des sources de cette nature, même si leur emploi ultérieur par la juridiction de jugement pour asseoir une condamnation peut être jugé incompatible avec les garanties de l'article 6 (voir, parmi d'autres, Kostovski c. Pays-Bas, 20 novembre 1989, § 44, série A no 166 ; pour des exemples relatifs à la question du témoignage anonyme, voir aussi, entre autres, Ellis et Simms c. Royaume-Uni et Martin c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), nos 46099/06 et 46699/06, 10 avril 2012, et Pesukic c. Suisse, no 25088/07, §§ 43-53, 6 décembre 2012).
• EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 27284/17

  KOZAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012; Turbylev v. Russia, no. 4722/09, § 90, 6 October 2015; Aleksandr Konovalov v. Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 13-14 and 54, 28 November 2017; Pesukic v. Switzerland, no. 25088/07, § 43, 6 December 2012; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016; and Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 37404/18

  OGUZ v. TÜRKIYE

  The fact that the public prosecutor had recorded the anonymous witness's identity and that the trial court had heard the anonymous witness directly and hence had the opportunity to form its own impression of his reliability cannot be regarded as decisive for the examination under Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention (see also Ürek and Ürek, cited above, § 66, and compare Pesukic v. Switzerland, no. 25088/07, § 50, 6 December 2012).
• EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 48628/12

  BALTA ET DEMIR c. TURQUIE

  Elle a estimé qu'il convenait de soumettre ce type de grief à un examen en trois points (Al-Khawaja et Tahery, précité, §§ 146-147, voir aussi, Tseber c. République tchèque, no 46203/08, § 45, 22 novembre 2012, et Prajina c. Roumanie, no 5592/05, § 43, 7 janvier 2014, et pour des exemples relatives à des témoignages anonymes voir entre autres, Ellis et Simms et Martin c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), nos 46099/06 et 46699/06, 10 avril 2012, et Pesukic c. Suisse, no 25088/07, §§ 43-53, 6 décembre 2012).
• EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 54146/09

  BÁTEK AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  26766/05 and 22228/06, ECHR 2011 and Pesukic v. Switzerland, no. 25088/07, 6 December 2012, and argued that the difficulties caused to the defence by admitting testimony from absent or anonymous witnesses must be accompanied by adequate procedural safeguards allowing for a correct and fair assessment of the reliability as evidence of such testimony.
• EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 12254/20

  YAYGIN c. TURQUIE

  La Cour rappelle que la Convention n'empêche pas de s'appuyer, au stade de l'instruction préparatoire, sur des sources telles que des indicateurs occultes, mais l'emploi ultérieur de déclarations anonymes comme preuves déterminantes pour justifier une condamnation pourrait soulever un problème au regard de l'équité de la procédure (voir, notamment, Kostovski c. Pays-Bas, 20 novembre 1989, § 44, série A no 166, et voir également pour des exemples relatifs à des témoignages anonymes, entre autres, Ellis et Simms et Martin c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), nos 46099/06 et 46699/06, 10 avril 2012, et Pesukic c. Suisse, no 25088/07, §§ 43-53, 6 décembre 2012).
• EGMR - 43978/16 (anhängig)

  SERGEYEV v. RUSSIA

  Were there good reasons to keep secret the identity of witness "Klichko" at the trials (see Pesukic v. Switzerland, no. 25088/07, § 45, 6 December 2012, and Scholer v. Germany, no. 14212/10, §§ 50-51, 18 December 2014)?.
• EGMR, 24.09.2019 - 41214/04

  GAYEVOY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA