Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DELIN v. BULGARIA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  DELIN v. BULGARIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 16.04.2013 - 40908/05

  FAZLIYSKI v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 62377/16

  The Court considers, in the light of its case-law, that this provision is applicable in the present case (see Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575/04, § 90, ECHR 2012, Ternovskis v. Latvia (no. 33637/02, § 44, 29 April 2014, Fazliyski v. Bulgaria, no. 40908/05, § 52, 16 April 2013, and Miryana Petrova, cited above, §§ 31, 32 and 35).

  The Court finds that the applicant has suffered non-pecuniary damage on account of the breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention found in the present case (see Fazliyski v. Bulgaria, no. 40908/05, § 75, 16 April 2013, and Miryana Petrova, § 49, cited above).

• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  STANEV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 62377/16

  It must in addition be pointed out that a judgment in which the Court finds a breach of the Convention or the Protocols thereto imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation not just to pay those concerned the sums awarded by way of just satisfaction, but also to choose, subject to supervision by the Committee of Ministers, the general and/or, if appropriate, individual measures to be adopted in its domestic legal order to put an end to the breach and to redress as far as possible its effects (see Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 254, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 10.08.2006 - 40476/98

  YANAKIEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 62377/16

  The most appropriate form of redress in cases where an applicant has not had access to a tribunal in breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention is, as a rule, to re-open the proceedings in due course and re-examine the case in keeping with all the requirements of a fair trial (see, among other authorities, Yanakiev v. Bulgaria, no. 40476/98, § 90, 10 August 2006, Fazliyski, § 76, and Miryana Petrova, § 50, cited above).

• EGMR, 06.09.2022 - 78815/16

  MARINOVSKI c. BULGARIE

  La Cour estime par ailleurs que la présente affaire est à distinguer des affaires Miryana Petrova c. Bulgarie (no 57148/08, 21 juillet 2016), Delin c. Bulgarie (no 62377/16, 6 décembre 2018), et Aleksandar Sabev c. Bulgarie (no 43503/08, 19 juillet 2018), dans lesquelles, en examinant des griefs tirés de l'étendue du contrôle juridictionnel sur des actes de l'administration, elle a conclu à la violation de l'article 6 § 1 en raison du refus par les tribunaux internes d'examiner des questions essentielles pour l'issue des litiges ayant opposé les requérants à l'administration, refus motivé par le fait que ces questions avaient été tranchées au préalable par l'administration de manière à lier les tribunaux par ses constats factuels.