Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ONOUFRIOU v. CYPRUS

  Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 24407/04
• EGMR, 24.04.2019 - 24407/04

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (18)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

  ILHAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 24407/04

  The lack of appropriate and timely medical care may amount to treatment contrary to Article 3 (see Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 87, ECHR 2000-VII).

  However, the remedy must be "effective" in practice as well as in law (see Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII).

• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 24407/04

  The Government also contended that the measure was necessary and proportionate (relying on Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, §§ 68 to 76, Series A no. 131; and Silver and Others, cited above, §§ 86 to 90 and 97 to 98).
• EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74

  SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 24407/04

  Finally, a norm cannot be regarded as a "law" unless it is formulated with sufficient precision to enable the citizen to regulate his conduct: he must be able - if need be with appropriate advice - to foresee, to a degree that is reasonable in the circumstances, the consequences which a given action may entail (see Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, §§ 47 and 49, Series A no. 30).

 
• EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13590/88

  CAMPBELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 24407/04

  The Court further emphasises the Ombudsman's role as a guardian of human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the importance of respect for the confidentiality of correspondence of prisoners with the Ombudsman since it could - and in this case did - concern allegations against the prison authorities (see, mutatis mutandis, Campbell v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1992, § 62, Series A no. 233).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 24407/04

  This requires that the proposed remedy be accessible, be capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offer reasonable prospects of success (see, among other authorities, Apostol, cited above, § 35; Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006-...; and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 24407/04

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 28.09.2000 - 25498/94

  MESSINA c. ITALIE (N° 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 24407/04

  The Government relied on Messina v. Italy (no. 2), no. 25498/94, §§ 59 to 74, ECHR 2000-X.
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 24407/04

  However, the State must ensure that a person is detained under conditions which are compatible with respect for his human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject him to distress or hardship exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 92 to 94, ECHR 2000-XI; and Cenbauer v. Croatia, no. 73786/01, § 44, ECHR 2006-III).
• EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 40907/98

  Griechenland, Ausweisung, Abschiebung, Abschiebungshaft, Haftbedingungen, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 24407/04

  Further, when assessing conditions of detention, account has to be taken of the cumulative effects of those conditions, as well as the specific allegations made by the applicant (Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

  PEERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 24407/04

  Furthermore, in considering whether treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, the Court will have regard to whether its object is to humiliate and debase the individual in question and whether, as far as the consequences are concerned, it adversely affected his or her personality in a manner incompatible with Article 3. However, the absence of any such purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of Article 3 (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 74, ECHR 2001-III; and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

  VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 30.03.2004 - 66561/01

  MERIT v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 48787/99

  Transnistrien
• EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 73786/01

  CENBAUER v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 71152/01

  BARSZCZ v. POLAND
• EKMR, 08.07.1978 - 7572/76

  ENSSLIN, BAADER and RASPE v. GERMANY
• EKMR, 10.07.1980 - 8158/78

  X. v. the UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 28.01.1994 - 17549/90

  HURTADO c. SUISSE