Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LAKATOS AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) Violation of Article 5 - Right to ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Lakatos and Others v. Serbia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  LAKATOS AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (25)

• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7654/76

  VAN OOSTERWIJCK c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08

  In States where the Convention is part of the law of the land, a complainant has to invoke its provisions if so doing is the only means open to him or her of obtaining the redress sought (see Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium, judgment of 6 November 1980, § 33, Series A no. 40).
• EGMR, 23.04.1992 - 11798/85

  CASTELLS v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08

  It is not necessary for the Convention right to be explicitly raised in domestic proceedings provided that the complaint is raised at least in substance (see Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, § 32, Series A no. 236; and Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 66, Reports 1996-IV).
• EGMR, 01.03.2007 - 72967/01

  BELEVITSKIY v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08

  The Government's objection in this regard must therefore be rejected, it being understood that it would also be inappropriate to divide the situation complained of regarding the extensions of the pre-trial detention prior to and after the said date (see, mutatis mutandis, Belevitskiy v. Russia, no. 72967/01, § 99, 1 March 2007; Sizov v. Russia, no. 33123/08, § 44, 15 March 2011; Smirnova v. Russia, nos.

 
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08

  While the degree of public scrutiny required may vary, the complainant must be afforded effective access to the investigatory procedure in all cases (see Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 137, ECHR 2004-IV).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08

  Treatment has been held by the Court to be "inhuman" because, inter alia, it was premeditated, was applied for hours at a stretch and caused either actual bodily injury or intense physical and mental suffering (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 120, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 26.06.1991 - 12369/86

  LETELLIER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08

  Where such grounds were "relevant" and "sufficient", the Court must also be satisfied that the national authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings at issue (see, amongst other authorities, Letellier v. France, judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207, § 35; YaÄŸcı and Sargın v. Turkey, judgment of 8 June 1995, § 50, Series A no. 319-A).
• EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 16419/90

  YAGCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08

  Where such grounds were "relevant" and "sufficient", the Court must also be satisfied that the national authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings at issue (see, amongst other authorities, Letellier v. France, judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207, § 35; YaÄŸcı and Sargın v. Turkey, judgment of 8 June 1995, § 50, Series A no. 319-A).
• EGMR, 22.02.2007 - 2293/03

  WIESER v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08

  Treatment has been considered "degrading" when it was such as to arouse in its victims feelings of fear, anguish and inferiority capable of humiliating and debasing them and possibly breaking their physical or moral resistance (see Hurtado v. Switzerland, 28 January 1994, opinion of the Commission, § 67, Series A no. 280, and Wieser v. Austria, no. 2293/03, § 36, 22 February 2007).
• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 46133/99

  SMIRNOVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08

  46133/99 and 48183/99, § 66, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts); and Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 130, 22 May 2012; see also paragraph 24 above as regards the Constitutional Court's approach to this issue).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08

  Where an individual is taken into police custody in good health but is found to be injured at the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 1936/63

  Neumeister ./. Österreich
• EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65

  RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 47940/99

  BALOGH v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 19.09.2006 - 23037/04

  MATIJASEVIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
• EGMR, 15.03.2011 - 33123/08

  SIZOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87

  TOMASI c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
• EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 5826/03

  IDALOV c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 14.11.2002 - 67263/01

  MOUISEL v. FRANCE
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 33394/96

  PRICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 22.02.1994 - 12954/87

  RAIMONDO v. ITALY
• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

• EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 31634/18

  RIMSEVICS v. LATVIA

  The Court notes that under this provision a complaint alleging a violation of the presumption of innocence by statements of those not involved in criminal proceedings can be submitted by the individual concerned in the course of the ongoing criminal proceedings (contrast Lakatos and Others v. Serbia, no. 3363/08, § 113 in fine, 7 January 2014, and Orkopiridze, cited above, § 114).
• EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 43627/16

  OKROPIRIDZE v. GEORGIA

  In such circumstances, only the civil-law remedy could, on the basis of the criteria set out in the Court's case-law, provide adequate and sufficient redress (see Lakatos and Others v. Serbia, no. 3363/08, §§ 108-11, 7 January 2014; Januskeviciene v. Lithuania, no. 69717/14, § 59, 3 September 2019, with further references).