Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ZABOR v. POLAND

  Art. 3, Art. 7, Art. 7 Abs. 2, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 17, Art. 18, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 73049/01

  Budweiser-Streit

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 33690/06

  In particular, the State was under an obligation to afford the parties to the dispute relevant judicial procedures (Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049/01, § 83, ECHR 2007-I).

  It therefore appears that the State fulfilled its obligation to afford the parties to the dispute judicial procedures which offer the necessary procedural guarantees and therefore enable the domestic courts and tribunals to adjudicate effectively and fairly in the light of the applicable law (see, Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049/01, § 83, ECHR 2007-I).

• EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 45036/98

  Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi ./. Irland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 33690/06

  It recalls that lease may be considered a proprietary interest attracting the protection of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see, Stretch v. the United Kingdom, no. 44277/98, §§ 32-35, 24 June 2003; Bruncrona v. Finland, no. 41673/98, § 79, 16 November 2004; Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036/98, § 140, ECHR 2005-VI) and thus this provision is applicable in the case.
• EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 42150/09

  BJEDOV v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 33690/06

  Whether or not a particular premises constitutes a "home" which attracts the protection of Article 8 § 1 will depend on the factual circumstances, namely, the existence of sufficient and continuous links with a specific place (see inter alia, Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, §§ 52-54; Prokopovich v. Russia, no. 58255/00, § 36, ECHR 2004-XI (extracts); Bjedov v. Croatia, no. 42150/09, § 57, 29 May 2012).

 
• EGMR, 24.06.2003 - 44277/98

  STRETCH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 33690/06

  It recalls that lease may be considered a proprietary interest attracting the protection of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see, Stretch v. the United Kingdom, no. 44277/98, §§ 32-35, 24 June 2003; Bruncrona v. Finland, no. 41673/98, § 79, 16 November 2004; Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036/98, § 140, ECHR 2005-VI) and thus this provision is applicable in the case.
• EGMR, 18.11.2004 - 58255/00

  PROKOPOVICH v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 33690/06

  Whether or not a particular premises constitutes a "home" which attracts the protection of Article 8 § 1 will depend on the factual circumstances, namely, the existence of sufficient and continuous links with a specific place (see inter alia, Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, §§ 52-54; Prokopovich v. Russia, no. 58255/00, § 36, ECHR 2004-XI (extracts); Bjedov v. Croatia, no. 42150/09, § 57, 29 May 2012).
• EGMR, 25.04.2006 - 41673/98

  BRUNCRONA v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 33690/06

  It recalls that lease may be considered a proprietary interest attracting the protection of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see, Stretch v. the United Kingdom, no. 44277/98, §§ 32-35, 24 June 2003; Bruncrona v. Finland, no. 41673/98, § 79, 16 November 2004; Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036/98, § 140, ECHR 2005-VI) and thus this provision is applicable in the case.

• EGMR, 11.04.2023 - 30782/16

  SIMONOVA v. BULGARIA

  Although there is no information about when exactly after 2009 the building was erected and when the applicant and her children moved in (see paragraph 5 above), the period of nearly one year between March 2014 and March 2015 - when the mayor issued the demolition order at issue in the present case (see paragraph 11 above) - is long enough to accept that the applicant's links with the building were sufficient and continuous, so that it qualified as her "home" (compare Ivanova and Cherkezov v. Bulgaria, no. 46577/15, §§ 8, 12 and 49, 21 April 2016; Sharxhi and Others v. Albania, no. 10613/16, §§ 9, 11 and 112, 11 January 2018; and Ghailan and Others v. Spain, no. 36366/14, § 55, 23 March 2021, and contrast Zabor v. Poland (dec.), no. 33690/06, § 74, 7 January 2014).